Enhancing Authentic Assessment in Large-Class Design Education Through Authentic Project-Based Learning
Keywords:
authentic assessment; authentic learning; critical thinking; large classes; project based learningAbstract
As global economies advance, the cultivation of critical thinking and creativity in higher education is increasingly important for societal and economic progress. Adopting traditional educational methods to larger class sizes where personalized attention is scarce is crucial. This research delves into the fusion of blended and authentic project-based learning by integrating online and face-to-face instruction to immerse students in practical scenarios. The study examines how these integrated methods can improve student engagement, critical thinking, creativity, and proposes an effective assessment system for large-class design education. Drawing from Herrington’s principles of authentic learning and utilizing a mixed-method approach, which includes a Likert scale survey of Design Management students, the research indicates a notable impact of blended and authentic learning on assessment outcomes. The study, presented within the ANABLE (Assessment strategy iN Authentic Blended Learning Environment) framework, emphasizes the enhancements in assessment practices. These improvements enable educators to track learning progress, identify areas needing enhancement, and gauge proficiency levels. The results imply that these pedagogical methods boost learning outcomes by involving students in complex, relevant problems, encouraging deep cognitive engagement, and offering personalized feedback. The findings suggest that these integrated strategies provide practical solutions for large classes, effectively equipping students for contemporary workforce requirements. Enhancing assessment techniques and promoting active learning enhance comprehension and memory retention, develop pertinent skills, foster deeper learning, facilitate fruitful collaboration, and enhance both assessment results and overall student contentment.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.22
References
Adi, S., Firmansyah, G., & Permana, R. (2021). The importance of multimedia technology in PE learning [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020), November 26, 2021 (pp. 182–185). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.034
Amin, M., & Bintang, S. (2020). Blended learning for vocational teacher candidates [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of Engineering and Implementation on Vocational Education (ACEIVE), November 16, 2019, Universitas Negeri Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-11-2019.2293113
Bostock, S. (1998). Constructivism in mass higher education: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00066
Brooks, S. R. (2022). Teachers’ experiences: Culturally responsive pedagogy, student engagement, and growth achievement [Doctoral dissertation]. St. John’s University, New York.
Deeb, K. (2007). The impact of social technologies on student performance in a collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 1(1/2), 121. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtcs.2007.014214
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
Fariani, R., Junus, K., & Santoso, H. (2023). Personalised learning in vocational higher education: A model for diverse learners [preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3404282/v1
Fook, C., & Sidhu, G. (2010). Authentic assessment and pedagogical strategies in higher education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.153.161
Haftador, A. M., Tehranineshat, B., Keshtkaran, Z., & Mohebbi, Z. (2023) A study of the effects of blended learning on university students’ critical thinking: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12(1), Article 95. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_665_22
Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 17(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170304
Herrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2006). Authentic tasks online: A synergy among learner, task, and technology. Distance Education, 27(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789639
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401?412). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_32
Hornsby, D., & Osman, R. (2014). Massification in higher education: Large classes and student learning. Higher Education, 67(6), 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9733-1
Hu, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). The scientific basis of authentic assessment and its implementation in English as a foreign language education. SHS Web of Conferences, 174, Article 01023. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317401023
Hussein, B. (2015). A blended learning approach to teaching project management: A model for active participation and involvement: Insights from Norway. Education Sciences, 5(2), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci5020104
Krismadinata, K., Verawardina, U., Jalinus, N., Rizal, F., Sukardi, Sudira, P., Ramadhani, D., Lubis, A. L., Friadi, J., Rahman Arifin, A. S., & Novaliendry, D. (2020). Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: Literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5801–5815. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082214
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
Matoti, S., & Lenong, B. (2018). Teaching large classes at an institution of higher learning in South Africa [Conference session]. Proceeding of the 40th International Academic Conference, Stockholm. https://doi.org/10.20472/iac.2018.040.044
Matta, B., Guzman, J., Stockly, S., & Widner, B. (2015). Class size effects on student performance in a hispanic-serving institution. The Review of Black Political Economy, 42(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-015-9214-5
Mbanga, S. (2023). Enhancing a quality teaching and learning environment in large classes in South African universities: A theoretical exposition. Annals of Social Sciences & Management Studies, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.19080/asm.2023.09.555773
Nickerson, R. S. (2010). How to discourage creative thinking in the classroom. In R. A. Beghetto, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 1?5). Cambridge University Press.
Nida, N., Usodo, B., & Saputro, D. (2020). The blended learning with WhatsApp media on mathematics creative thinking skills and math anxiety. Journal of Education and Learning (Edulearn), 14(2), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.16233
Nyagope, T. (2023). Massification at higher education institutions: Challenges associated with teaching large classes and how it impacts the quality of teaching and learning. Al-Mudarris: Journal of Education, 6(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.32478/al-mudarris.v6i2.1842
Okpamen, K. (2024). Psychological implication of large class size on academic staff and students performance in Nigeria tertiary institutions. IJFBM, 2(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijfbm.v2i3.1884
Oktaria, S., Sasongko, R., & Kristiawan, M. (2021). Development of blended learning designs using Moodle to support academics of the curriculum in University of Bengkulu. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.1.2021.548
Ornellas, A., Falkner, K., & Edman Stålbrandt, E. (2019). Enhancing graduates’ employability skills through authentic learning approaches. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 9(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-04-2018-0049
Pishchukhina, O., & Allen, A. (2021). Supporting learning in large classes: Online formative assessment and automated feedback [Conference session]. 2021 30th Annual Conference of the European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE), September 10, 2021, Prague, Czech Republic. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/eaeeie50507.2021.9530953
Roshan, A., Gurbaz, M., & Rahmani, S. (2022). The effects of large classes on English language teaching. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 2(2), 38?41. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.2.2.20
Samuel, S. I. (2023). A blended institutional learning approach for the higher education sustainability. EDP Sciences, 156, Article 09002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315609002
Tunaz, M. (2023). Pre-service ELT teachers’ perspectives of language assessment in emergency distance education. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 0(93), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1202936
Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 4(4), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247
Wang, L., & Calvano, L. (2022). Class size, student behaviors and educational outcomes. Organization Management Journal, 19(4), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-01-2021-1139
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19
Xian, T. (2021). Course teaching reform research of English academic paper writing for English majors based on blended learning [Conference session]. Proceeding of the 2021 6th International Conference on Modern Management and Education Technology (MMET 2021), October 12, 2021. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211011.091
Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2017, March 17). Implications of the Fourth Industrial Age on higher education. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.09643
Yuliyana, M., Rochmiyati, R., & Maulina, D. (2021). Blended learning assessment instrument for elementary school. Edunesia Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(3), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i3.189
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lisa Indriati, Neo Mai, Heidi Tan Yeen-Ju
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).