Teaching Geometry in Mathematics Education (2016-2025): A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

  • Siti Noor Iliana Zuraida Zainan Abidin
  • Siti Mistima Maat
  • Fariza Khalid

Keywords:

bibliometric analysis; systematic literature review; teaching geometry; geometry knowledge

Abstract

Geometry plays a central role in mathematics education, yet research on effective teaching strategies remains fragmented, particularly in integrating theoretical, cognitive and technology driven perspectives. A combination of bibliometric and systematic review methods was employed to analyse 1196 articles published between 2016 and 2025, retrieved from the Web of Science database. Data were analysed using bibliometric techniques, including co-citation analysis and network visualization with VOSviewer, alongside thematic synthesis. The findings reveal three major thematic clusters: (1) theoretical and pedagogical foundations, (2) cognitive development and spatial reasoning and (3) applied and empirical studies on early spatial learning. The findings highlight the growing integration of spatial reasoning and digital technologies in shaping effective instructional approaches, alongside the continued influence of established pedagogical frameworks. However, several research gaps remain, including limited representation from certain regions, underexplored interdisciplinary collaborations and the need for more evidence on the long-term impact of innovative teaching methods such as Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality and adaptive learning technologies. Theoretically, this study contributes by providing a structured understanding of the intellectual landscape of geometry teaching research. Practically, the findings offer guidance for educators and policymakers in designing more effective, evidence-based instructional strategies. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive synthesis to inform future research and practice in mathematics education.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.5.15

References

Abdi, A. I., Omar, A. M., Mahdi, A. O., Asiimwe, C., & Osman, M. A. (2024). Tracing the evolution of STEM education: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1457938

Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. In Contemporary Educational Technology (Vol. 16, Issue 2). Bastas. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289

Aderibigbe, A. O., Peter Efosa Ohenhen, Nwabueze Kelvin Nwaobia, Joachim Osheyor Gidiagba, & Emmanuel Chigozie Ani. (2023). Artificial intelligence in developing countries: Bridging the gap between potential and implementation. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 4(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v4i3.629

Ang, P. S., Maat, S. M., & Rosli, R. (2025). Tracing the evolution of mathematics learning autism: A bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(3), 961–979. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.3.961

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Arvanitaki, M., & Zaranis, N. (2020). The use of ICT in teaching geometry in primary school. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5003–5016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10210-7

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355

Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., & Terry, S. J. (2020). COVID-Induced Economic Uncertainty. www.worlduncertaintyindex.com.

Barut, M. E. O., & Retnawati, H. (2020). Geometry learning in vocational high school: Investigating the students’ difficulties and levels of thinking. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012058

Battista, M. T. (2007). The Development of Geometric and Spatial Thinking. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 843–908.

Blanco-Mesa, F., Merigó, J. M., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2017). Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161640

Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389–2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers and Education, 68, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017

Cahyono, A. N., & Ludwig, M. (2019). Teaching and learning mathematics around the city supported by the use of digital technology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99514

Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177177

Chaudhari, M. M., Ponnuswamy, D., Muqeem, M., & Bhaladhare, P. R. (2025). Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in education: assessing the impact on educational Systems, content delivery, and student engagement. In International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews Journal homepage: www.ijrpr.com (Issue 6). www.ijrpr.com

Cheng, Y. L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186

Chigeza, P., & Halbert, K. (2014). Navigating E-learning and blended learning for pre-service teachers: Redesigning for engagement, access and efficiency. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(11), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n11.8

Choudhary, V., Marchetti, A., Shrestha, Y. R., & Puranam, P. (2025). Human-AI ensembles: when can they work? Journal of Management, 51(2), 536–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231194968

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cragg, L., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., Roome, H. E., & Gilmore, C. (2017). Direct and indirect influences of executive functions on mathematics achievement. Cognition, 162, 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014

Crompton, H., & Ferguson, S. (2024). An analysis of the essential understandings in elementary geometry and a comparison to the common core standards with teaching implications. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/14361

Davies, A., Veli?kovi?, P., Buesing, L., Blackwell, S., Zheng, D., Tomašev, N., Tanburn, R., Battaglia, P., Blundell, C., Juhász, A., Lackenby, M., Williamson, G., Hassabis, D., & Kohli, P. (2021). Advancing mathematics by guiding human intuition with AI. Nature, 600(7887), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04086-x

Demetriou, A., Kazi, S., Makris, N., & Spanoudis, G. (2020). Cognitive ability, cognitive self-awareness, and school performance: From childhood to adolescence. Intelligence, 79, 101432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101432

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dooren, W. Van. (2006). Performance Measurement in the Flemish Public Sector: A Supply and Demand Approach [University of Antwerp]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264031328

Douglas A. Grouws. (1992). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. .

Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428

English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem Solving for the 21st Century. In Theories of Mathematics Education (pp. 263–290). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_27

Erdo?mu?, C., Çak?r, R., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2021). Students’ knowledge sharing behaviours and sense of online learning community in online learning environments. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.53.9.3

Fowler, S., Cutting, C., Kennedy, J. P., Leonard, S. N., Gabriel, F., & Jaeschke, W. (2022). Technology enhanced learning environments and the potential for enhancing spatial reasoning: A mixed methods study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00368-9

Garfield, E., Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., Bornmann, L., & Wagner, C. (2017). Betweenness and Diversity in Journal Citation Networks as Measures of Interdisciplinarity-A Tribute to Betweenness and Diversity in Journal Citation Networks as Measures of Interdisciplinarity-A Tribute to Eugene Garfield-Scientometrics (Memorial Issue, 2018). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316842312

Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027433

Hawes, Z. C. K., Gilligan-Lee, K. A., & Mix, K. S. (2022). Effects of spatial training on mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 58(1), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001281

Huang, L. H., & Zhu, H. L. (2021). Digital transformation and management of enterprises: research framework and prospects. Journal of Management Science, 24, 26–35.

Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002

IEA. (2020). World Energy Outlook 2020. www.iea.org/weo

Ismail, S. A. S., Maat, S. M., & Khalid, F. (2024). 35 years of fraction learning: Integrating systematic review and bibliometric analysis on a global scale. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15657

Ismail, S. A. S., Maat, S. M., & Khalid, F. (2025). From numbers to nerves: A score year of scientometric study on mathematics anxiety. Acta Psychologica, 260, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105621

Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and learning of geometry—A literature review on current developments in theory and practice. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070682

Jian, M. J. K. O. (2023). Personalized learning through AI. Advances in Engineering Innovation, 5(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-3903/5/2023039

Jones, K. (2012). Geometrical and spatial reasoning: Challenges for research in mathematics education. XXIII Seminário de Investigação Em Educação Matemática, 3–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348650705

Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st century skills. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 05–10. https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199

Khalil, I. A., Zahrani, A. A. L., Awaji, B., & Mohsen, M. (2024). Mapping the future of innovation: A bibliometric analysis of STEM education trends in K-12. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(8), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.5

Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2017). The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0503-8

Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2020). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12412

Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.940

Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2024). How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research. Journal of Business Research, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114760

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1985.tb00213.x

Liu, W., Affas, H., & Osmond, D. (2025). A Study on the investigation of students’ reasoning skills in secondary geometry proofing. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 08(03), 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i3-24

Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2023). Spatial visualization supports students’ math: Mechanisms for spatial transfer. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060127

Mayantao, R., & Tantiado, R. C. (2024). Teachers’ utilization of digital Tools and confidence in technology. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 07(05), 1945–1952. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i05-16

Migliavaca, C. B., Stein, C., Colpani, V., Munn, Z., & Falavigna, M. (2020). Quality assessment of prevalence studies: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 127, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.039

Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y.-L. (2012). The Relation Between Space and Math: Developmental and Educational Implications. In Janette B. Benson (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 42, pp. 197–243). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394388-0.00006-X

Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y.-L., Young, C., Hambrick, D. Z., Ping, R., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2016). Separate but correlated: The latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1206–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000182

Mora, C., Rollins, R. L., Taladay, K., Kantar, M. B., Chock, M. K., Shimada, M., & Franklin, E. C. (2019). Matters arising. Nature Climate Change, 9(9), 658–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0538-1

Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Khalil, H., Alexander, L., McLnerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., Peters, M., & Tricco, A. C. (2022). What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 950–952. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00483

Muzaini, M. C. (2023). Implementation of blended learning model through wordwall application in improving critical thinking of islamic elementary school students. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 13(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.18952/aladzkapgmi.v13i2.10880

Nayak, S. S., Amini-Salehi, E., Ulrich, M. T., Sahli, Y., Fleischman, M., Patel, M., Naeiji, M., Maghsoodifar, H., Sadeghi Douki, S. A. H., Alotaibi, A., Faraji, N., Hassanipour, S., Hashemi, M., & Keivanlou, M.-H. (2025). Exploring the evolution of evidence synthesis: A bibliometric analysis of umbrella reviews in medicine. Annals of Medicine & Surgery, 87(4), 2035–2048. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003034

NCTM. (2000). Executive Summary Principles and Standards for School Mathematics Overview.

Ndlovu, M., & Mji, A. (2012). Pedagogical implications of students’ misconceptions about deductive geometric proof. Acta Academica: Critical Views on Society, Culture and Politics, 44(3), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.38140/aa.v44i3.1364

Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x

OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019 : OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006

Rivella, C., Bombonato, C., Pecini, C., Frascari, A., & Viterbori, P. (2024). Improving executive functions at school. Integrating metacognitive exercise in class and computerized training at home to ensure training intensity and generalization. A feasibility pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2719–2739. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13470

Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: Assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 13, 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1

Sengodan, V., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2025). A bibliometric and systematic analysis of mathematics interest (2021-2025). Educational Process International Journal, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.389

Serin, H. (2018). A comparison of teacher-centered and student-centered approaches in educational settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(1), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i1p164

Shafiee, M. S., & Meng, C. C. (2023). Impact of concrete-pictorial-abstract approach with collaborative lesson research on year four pupils’ proficiency in volume. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 38(1), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2023.38.1.7

Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701

Shulman, L. S. (2019). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Profesorado, 23(3), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i3.11230

Sinclair, R. R., Allen, T., Barber, L., Bergman, M., Britt, T., Butler, A., Ford, M., Hammer, L., Kath, L., Probst, T., & Yuan, Z. (2020). Occupational health science in the time of COVID-19: Now more than ever. Occupational Health Science, 4(1–2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-020-00064-3

Surbakti, R., Umboh, S. E., Pong, M., & Dara, S. (2024). Cognitive load theory: Implications for instructional design in digital classrooms. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(6), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v2i6.1659

Takayama, K. (2017). Imagining East Asian education otherwise: Neither caricature, nor scandalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1310697

Talan, G., & Sharma, G. D. (2019). Doing well by doing good: A systematic review and research agenda for sustainable investment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020353

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial Thinking and STEM Education. When, Why, and How? Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 57, 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2

Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Elia, I. (2012). Developing a framework for the evaluation of picturebooks that support kindergartners’ learning of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 17–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.657437

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and Insight. A Theory of Mathematics Education. Academic Press.

Van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 310–316. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.5.6.0310

Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599

Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh?Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). I. spatial skills, their development, and their links to mathematics. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12280

Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh?Pasek, K., Newcombe, N. S., Filipowicz, A. T., & Chang, A. (2014). Deconstructing building blocks: preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85(3), 1062–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12165

Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning Over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies Its Importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127

Zhang, J., & Chen, Z. (2023). Exploring human resource management digital transformation in the digital age. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 1482–1498.

Zupic, I., & ?ater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Abidin, S. N. I. Z. Z. ., Maat, S. M. ., & Khalid, F. . (2026). Teaching Geometry in Mathematics Education (2016-2025): A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(5), 321–353. Retrieved from https://ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2856

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)