What about Study Motivation? Students´ and Teachers’ Perspectives on What Affects Study Motivation

Authors

  • Lena Boström
  • Göran Bostedt

Keywords:

increasing motivation; decreasing motivation; students´ and teachers’ perspectives; study motivation; upper secondary school

Abstract

One out of every four upper secondary school students in Sweden interrupts their education, although the intention behind the new Curriculum for Upper Secondary School (GY 11) was to increase throughput of students with complete grades. Lack of study motivation is the most important explanation for students dropping out. This article analyzes study motivation from students and teachers’ perspectives. It is based on interviews in three upper secondary school programs that were analyzed with a qualitative approach and hybrid content analysis. Study motivation is set in relation to motivational strategies, achievement, and learning environment. The result showed similarities and differences in perceptions. Both teachers and students pointed to the importance of teachers, practical pedagogy, social relations, and the significance of grades for study motivation. An important difference between informants was that teachers put more emphasis on life skills and adapted study groups, whereas students pointed to the physical learning environment and teachers’ personalities as important. Conclusions in the study point to complex interplay between internal and external motivational factors and between situation, person, and learning processes. This leads to validity of interactive and transactional motivational perspectives. A broader and more in-depth study is needed primarily to understand students’ perspectives.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.3

References

Ahlberg, A. (2001). Lärande och delaktighet [Learning and participation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2009). Motivating children and adolescents in Schools. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Antonovsky, A. (2005). Hälsans mysterium [The mystery of health]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.

Aspelin, J. (2018). Lärares relationskompetens [Teacher’s relationship skills]. Stockholm: Liber.

Augustsson, G., & Boström, L. (2016). Teachers’ leadership in the didactic room: A systematic literature review of international research. Acta Didactica Norge - tidsskrift for fagdidaktisk forsknings- og utviklingsarbeid i Norge, 10, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.2883

Björklid, P., & Fischbein, P. (2011). Det pedagogiska samspelet. [The pedagogical interaction]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Blomgren, J. (2016). Den svårfångade motivationen: elever i en digital lärmiljö [The difficult-to-capture motivation: Students in a digital learning environment]. (Diss) Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.

Boström, L. (2013). Hur lär sig elever på sex olika yrkesprogram? En studie om skillnader och likheter i lärstilar. [How do students learn in six different vocational programs? A study of differences and similarities in learning styles]. Utbildning & Lärande, 4(1), 48-65.

Boström, L., & Bostedt, G. (2020). Hur lär sig elever på två olika yrkesprogram? En studie om skillnader och likheter i lär- och undervisningsstrategier av betydelse för elevers studiemotivation. [How do students learn in two different vocational programs? A study about differences and similarities in learning and teaching strategies of importance for study motivation]. Kognition og Pædagogik, 116, 100-115.

Boström, L., & Gidlund, U. (2016). Students’ need for structure—the forgotten learning styles preference. In N. Preston (ed.), Assessment, performance and effectiveness (pp. 12-20). Nova Science Publishers.

Covington, M. V., & Mueller, K. J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation. Education Psychology Review, 13, 157-176.

Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. Retrieved from http://dewey.pragmatism.org/creed.htm

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Farrington, C., Roderick, E., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T., Johnson, D., & Beechum, N. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical review. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium and Chicago School Research.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Gidlund, U., & Boström, L. (2017). What is inclusive didactics? Teachers´ understanding of inclusive didactics for students with EBD in Swedish mainstream schools. International Education Studies, 10(5), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n5p87

Giotta, J. (2017). Den svårfångade motivationen, elevers välmående och skolprestationer [The hard-captured motivation, student well-being and school achievement]. Lecture 2017-10-30, Sundsvall.

Giota, J. (2013). Individualisering i skolan – vilken, varför och hur? [Individualization at school - which, why and how?] Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie, 3. Stockholm.

Granström, K. (2012). Tre aspekter på lärares ledarskap i klassrummet. In G. Berg, F. Sundh, C. Wede (eds.), Lärare som ledare [Teacher as leader](pp. 27-48). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Grönqvist, E., & Vlachos, J. (2008). Hur lärares förmågor påverkar elevers studieresultat [How teachers ‘abilities affect students’ learning outcomes]. IFAU. Rapport 2008:25

Håkansson, J., & Sundberg, D. (2012) Utmärkt undervisning. Framgångsfaktorer i svensk och internationell belysning [Excellent teaching. Success factors in Swedish and international lighting]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.

Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

Hofvenberg, A. (2020). Motivation, students, and the classroom environment. Exploring the role of Swedish students´ achievement goals in chemistry. (Diss) Umeå: Umeå Universitet.

Hsieh, H.-S., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Hugo, M. (2011). Från motstånd till framgång - att motivera när ingen motivations finns [From resistance to success - to motivate when there is no motivation]. Stockholm: Liber.

Imsen, G. (2006). Elevens värld. Introduktion till pedagogisk psykologi [The student’s world. Introduction to educational psychology]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Jerkeby, S. (2019). Att redan vara motiverad – om hinder och möjligheter för lärande [To be motivated already - about barriers and opportunities for learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Lundahl, L., Lidström, L., Lindblad, M., Lovén, A., Olofsson, J., & Öst, J. (2015) Osäkra övergångar. Resultatdialog 2015 (pp. 107-116). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2018): Does motivation matter? – The relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and enthusiasm and students’ performance. PLOS ONE, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207252

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).

Niemivirta, M. (2004). Skillnader mellan flickor och pojkar i inlärningsmotivation. Skola-kön-inlärningsresultat [Differences between girls and boys in learning motivation. School-gender-learning results]. Helsingfors: Utbildningsstyrelsen.

Perry, N. E., Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2006). Classrooms as context for motivating learning. In P.A. Alexander & P.H. Winne (ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 1-64). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Rising Holmström, M., Häggström, M., & Kristiansen, L. (2015). Skolsköterskans rolltransformering till den hälsofrämjande positionen [The role of the school nurse in transforming the health-promoting position]. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 25(4), 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0107408315587860

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (ed.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Skolverket. (2016). Uppföljning av gymnasieskolan [Follow-up of upper secondary school]. Skolverket: Stockholm.

Skolverket. (2018). Från gymnasieskola till högskola [From upper secondary school to university]. Rapport 466. Stockholm: Skolverket.

Skolverket. (2019). Redovisning av Skolverkets uppdrag om att genomföra verksamhetsnära insatser för att förebygga avhopp från gymnasieskolan [Report on the National Agency for Education’s assignment to implement business-related initiatives to prevent dropping out of upper secondary school]. Dnr 7.2.1-2016:32

Stensmo, C. (2005). Ledarskap i klassrummet [Leadership in the classroom]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Sveriges Elevkårer & Lärarnas Riksförbund. (2015). Från avhopp till examen - en undersökning bland gymnasieelever och lärare om faktorer som påverkar genomströmningen i gymnasieskolan [From drop-out to graduation - a survey among high school students and teachers about factors that affect the throughput in high school]. Stockholm.

Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (SKL). (2017). Olika är normen. Att skapa inkluderande lärmiljöer i skolan [Different is the norm. To create inclusive learning environments in the school]. Sveriges kommuner och Landsting.

Säljö, R. (2014). Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv [Learning in practice. A socio-cultural perspective]. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Vaanstenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory. Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4

Valsö, M., & Malmgren, F. (2019). Fysisk lärmiljö: optimera för trygghet, arbetsro och lärande [Physical learning environment: optimize for security, work peace and learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningssed [Good research practice]. Vetenskapsrådet.

Wery, J., & Thomson, M. (2013). Motivational strategies to enhance effective learning in teaching struggling students. British Journal of Learning Support. 28(3), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12027

Woolfolk, A., & Karlberg, M. (2015) Pedagogisk psykologi [Individualization in a school context]. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

X Municipality, (2016). Mål och resultatplan 2016 [Goal-and result plan 2016]. Barn- och Utbildningsnämnden.

Zimmerman, F. (2018). Det tillåtande och det begränsande. En studie om pojkars syn på studier och ungdomars normer kring maskulinitet [The permissive and the restrictive. A study on boys ‘views on studies and adolescents’ norms about masculinity] (Dissertation). Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31