Transforming High School Education with Digital Tools: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Gulmira Abildinova
  • Almagul Assainova
  • Anara Karymsakova
  • Dariya Abykenova
  • Meruyert Temirkhanova

Keywords:

Educational Technology; Technology Integration; Systematic Review; Secondary Education; Pedagogical Practices

Abstract

This systematic review comprehensively examines the impact of digital tools on high school education, drawing from 23 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2023. The study explores a wide range of research methodologies, including randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, and experimental studies, to assess the effectiveness of digital technologies in enhancing education outcomes. The findings indicate that digital tools, particularly those integrated using the substitution augmentation modification and redefinition model, significantly improve student autonomy, engagement, and academic performance across diverse geographic and demographic contexts. However, the review also identifies challenges, such as the complexity of content, technological disparities, and the necessity for well-planned and context-sensitive implementation strategies. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of professional development for educators and the need for infrastructural support to ensure equitable access to technology. The study underscores the critical role of collaboration among educators, policymakers, and stakeholders to maximize the benefits of digital education. The review calls for ongoing research into innovative educational technologies and their long-term effects, and advocates for a strategic and well-supported approach to integrating these tools into high school settings.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.34

References

Azam, F. K. K., Fadhil, F., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Enhancing ESL Learners’ Writing Skills via ProvWrit. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 660–669.

Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! Computers & Education, 166, 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159

Cai, S., Liu, E., Shen, Y., Liu, C., Li, S., & Shen, Y. (2020). Probability learning in mathematics using augmented reality: Impact on student’s learning gains and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696839

Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2019). Tablet-based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self-efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12718

Dooley, C. M., Ellison, T. L., Welch, M. M., Allen, M., & Bauer, D. (2016). Digital Participatory Pedagogy: Digital Participation as a Method for Technology Integration in Curriculum. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(2), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1138912

Faour, M. A., & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). The Effect of Using Virtual Laboratory on Grade 10 Students’ Conceptual Understanding and their Attitudes towards Physics. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.387482

Homer, B. D., Plass, J. L., Rose, M. C., MacNamara, A. P., Pawar, S., & Ober, T. M. (2019). Activating adolescents’ “hot” executive functions in a digital game to train cognitive skills: The effects of age and prior abilities. Cognitive Development, 49, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.11.005

Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, J.-C., Lin, C.-Y., Zhuo, P.-W., & Lin, K.-Y. (2018). Using 3D printing technology with experiential learning strategies to improve preengineering students’ comprehension of abstract scientific concepts and hands-on ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12319

Kühl, T., & Münzer, S. (2019). The moderating role of additional information when learning with animations compared to static pictures. Instructional Science, 47(6), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09498-x

Kunnath, B., & Kriek, J. (2018). Exploring effective pedagogies using computer simulations to improve Grade 12 learners’ understanding of the photoelectric effect. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1531500

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309921

Lozada, R. N. R., Fernández, J. A. G., Dávila, R. G. C., Delgado, J. G. R., & Fernández, B. H. (2022). Google Classroom in Educational Service: A systematic Review. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), Article 2.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-Based micro-Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240

Puentedura, R. R. (2010). SAMR and TPCK: Intro to Advanced Practice. Ruben R. Puentedura’s Weblog. http://hippasus.com/resources/sweden2010/SAMR_TPCK_IntroToAdvancedPractice.pdf

Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, 103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682

Sari, N. M., Zakariya, Z., & Khoo, Y. Y. (2022). Systematic literature review of Google Classroom assisted learning: Effects, strengths and challenges. 27.

Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. F. (2017). Left to their own devices: The everyday realities of one-to-one classrooms. Oxford Review of Education, 43(3), 289?310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1305047

Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., & Liu, T.-Y. (2018). Investigating the effectiveness of a learning activity supported by a mobile multimedia learning system to enhance autonomous EFL learning in authentic contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9590-1

Stenberdt, V. A., & Makransky, G. (2023). Mastery experiences in immersive virtual reality promote pro-environmental waste-sorting behavior. Computers & Education, 198, 104760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104760

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

Torbaghan, M. E., Sasidharan, M., Jefferson, I., & Watkins, J. (2022). Preparing Students for a Digitised Future. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2022.3174263

Wang, J., Jou, M., Lv, Y., & Huang, C.-C. (2018). An investigation on teaching performances of model-based flipping classroom for physics supported by modern teaching technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.018

Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2019). Transitioning from introductory block-based and text-based environments to professional programming languages in high school computer science classrooms. Computers & Education, 142, 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103646

Wen, C.-T., Liu, C.-C., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Yang, C.-W., & Hwang, F.-K. (2020). Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830

Winkler, R., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021). Enhancing problem-solving skills with smart personal assistant technology. Computers & Education, 165, 104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104148

Xing, W., Huang, X., Li, C., & Xie, C. (2023). Teaching thermodynamics with augmented interaction and learning analytics. Computers & Education, 196, 104726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104726

Yang, Q.-F., Chang, S.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students’ English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behaviors. Computers & Education, 148, 103808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103808

Yusrianti, S., Guilin, X., Artanty, A., Jiao, D., & Setyawan, G. (2024). The Role of Google Classroom Application in Improving High School Student Achievement. World Psychology, 3(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.55849/wp.v3i1.615

Zakaria, M. A., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). The Impact of Digital Storytelling on ESL Narrative Writing Skill. SSRN Electronic Journal, Special Issue on CALL(5). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3431789

Zheng, J., Xing, W., & Zhu, G. (2019). Examining sequential patterns of self- and socially shared regulation of STEM learning in a CSCL environment. Computers & Education, 136, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.005

Zhong, X., & Wakat, G. (2023). Enhancing grammar proficiency of EFL learners through corpus-integrated lessons. Ampersand, 11, 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100139

Zhuoluo, M. A., Liu, Y., & Zhao, L. (2019). Effect of haptic feedback on a virtual lab about friction. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 1(4), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2019.07.001

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30