Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Postgraduate Research Skills in Sustainable Language Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Keywords:
AI in language education; academic writing support; postgraduates; higher education; sustainabilityAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been utilized in multiple disciplines, including educational areas, to improve and expedite various tasks that were once considered to be time-consuming and exhaustive. In education, although extensive research has been conducted to examine the integration of AI in pedagogical designs and practices, research focusing on AI utilities in enhancing research skills among students, particularly postgraduates, remains inadequately investigated. This gap exists despite the fact that postgraduates are the central point of research work due to their substantial involvement in the thorough methodological process. Therefore, this review systematically examines the available evidence on AI's potential to improve postgraduates’ research skills in sustainable language education. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), the review employed systematic searching strategies in Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ERIC. A total of 22 articles were included and data from the selected literature were subsequently extracted and examined using thematic analysis, which revealed four major themes and 13 subthemes explaining the substantial potential of AI in this context. This diverse potential was discussed through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to illustrate how AI can sustainably support research skills development among postgraduates. Thus, by referring to this review, policymakers are encouraged to develop suitable programs, guidelines, and frameworks for postgraduates or novice researchers to use AI responsibly and thoughtfully to optimize their research-based tasks and academic writing.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.9.20
References
Abdulah, D. M., Zaman, B. A., Mustafa, Z. R., & Hassan, L. H. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Integration in Academic Writing: Insights from the University of Duhok. ARO-The Scientific Journal of Koya University, 12(2), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.11794
Abeid, M., Mbekenga, C., Jusabani, A. M., Kassamali, S. A., Mgonja, M. L., Sibuma, M., Sirili, N., & Noorani, M. (2025). “It’s the Time they Take to Give Feedback; it has Become a Problem” Exploring Barriers and Facilitators for Research Supervision in Postgraduate Medical Education in Tanzania. A Qualitative Study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 16, 685–698. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S512498
Aguirre-Aguilar, G., Esquivel-Gámez, I., Edel-Navarro, R., & Veytia-Buchelli, M. G. (2024). AI in the development of research skills in postgraduate studies. Alteridad, 19(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v19n2.2024.01
Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
Alshwiah, A. (2024). Students’ perceptions of an artificially intelligent chatbot as a support tool to develop their research skills. Qualitative Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-06-2024-0117
Bernard, N., Sagawa, Y., Bier, N., Lihoreau, T., Pazart, L., & Tannou, T. (2025). Using artificial intelligence for systematic review: the example of elicit. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25(1), Article 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02528-y
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Bouzar, A., El Idrissi, K., & Ghourdou, T. (2024). ChatGPT and Academic Writing Self-Efficacy: Unveiling Correlations and Technological Dependency among Postgraduate Students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), (Special Issue on ChatGPT), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.15
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chang, A., & Nkansah, J. O. (2024). Literacy for Sustainable Education: A Premise of Pedagogical Inclusiveness and Multilingualism in Higher Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(24), Article 10943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410943
Chauke, T. A., Mkhize, T. R., Methi, L., & Dlamini, N. (2024). Postgraduate Students’ Perceptions on the Benefits Associated with Artificial Intelligence Tools for Academic Success: The Use of the ChatGPT AI Tool. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2024.4
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chia, C. S. C., Phan, J., Harry, O., & Lee, K. M. (2024). Graduate students’ perception and use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to develop writing skills. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240308
Chubb, J., Cowling, P., & Reed, D. (2022). Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process. AI and Society, 37, 1439–1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01259-0
Dai, Y., Lai, S., Lim, C. P., & Liu, A. (2023). ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision: Insights from Australian postgraduate research students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8843
Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2290342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Elkatm??, M. (2024). Chat GPT and creative writing: Experiences of master’s students in enhancing. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 11(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2024.11.3.597
Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024). The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 865–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881
Flemming, K., Booth, A., Garside, R., Tunçalp, Ö., & Noyes, J. (2019). Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods. BMJ Global Health, 4(Suppl 1), Article e000882. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000882
Ge, N., Wang, E., & Li, Y. (2023). Foreign Language Education for Sustainable Development in China: A Case Study of German Language Education. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086340
Gusenbauer, M. (2018). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching. PLoS ONE, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138237
Hegazy, A. Z., Gaber, S. A., Alkhateeb, I. A., Alqatam, M. A., Almughyirah, S. M., Mahgoub, Y. M., & Shahat, H. A. (2024). Saudi Postgraduate Students` Ethical Commitment between Awareness and Application of Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Writing. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.28
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovi?, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 343, d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
Hong, H., Vate-U-Lan, P., & Viriyavejakul, C. (2025). Cognitive Offload Instruction with Generative AI: A Quasi-Experimental Study on Critical Thinking Gains in English Writing. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10072
Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018: User guide. McGill University.
Islam, M. M., Shahadat Hosen, M., Khan, S. I., Vayyala, R., Oyebode, D., & Mia, M. S. (2025). Data Analyst with Expertise in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(14s), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i14s.2328
Khalil, E. R. (2025). Sustainable Development in Language Education. Tasnim International Journal for Human, Social and Legal Sciences, 4(2), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.56924/tasnim.13.2025/27
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (Version 2.3, EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). https://legacyfileshare.elsevier.com/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
Koraishi, O., & Karatepe, Ç. (2025). Minds VS Machines: A Comparative Study of AI and Teacher-Generated Summaries in English Language Teaching. Technology in Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), Article 1796-3. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v7n1.1796
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
Kulkov, I., Kulkova, J., Rohrbeck, R., Menvielle, L., Kaartemo, V., & Makkonen, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence - driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 2253–2267. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2773
Kumar, S., & Gunn, A. (2024). Doctoral students’ reflections on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) are used in the literature review process. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1395–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2427049
Lee, S.-M. (2020). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186
Linares-Espinós, E., Hernández, V., Domínguez-Escrig, J. L., Fernández-Pello, S., Hevia, V., Mayor, J., Padilla-Fernández, B., & Ribal, M. J. (2018). Methodology of a systematic review. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition), 42(8), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2018.07.002
Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
Lubis, A. H., Samsudin, D., Triarisanti, R., Jerusalem, M. I., & Hwang, Y. (2024). A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis of Publications on The Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Language Learning. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 38(1), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.38.1.156176
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Mohammed, A. A. Q., Al-ghazali, A., & Alqohfa, K. A. S. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT uses in higher studies: A case study of Arab postgraduates in India. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i2.55
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, Article b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Morgan, D. L. (2023). Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), Article e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Nemt-Allah, M., Khalifa, W., Badawy, M., Elbably, Y., & Ibrahim, A. (2024). Validating the ChatGPT usage scale: Psychometric properties and factor structures among postgraduate students. BMC Psychology, 12, Article 497. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01983-4
Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Educational Research (1st ed., pp. 3–22). Springer VS Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7
Nguyen, T. N. N., Tran, T. T., Nguyen, N. H. A., Lam, H. P., Nguyen, H. M. S., & Tran, N. A. T. (2025). The Benefits and Challenges of AI Translation Tools in Translation Education at the Tertiary Level: A Systematic Review. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 5(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.25527
Okoli, C. (2015). A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 879–910. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03743
Ou, A. W., Khuder, B., Franzetti, S., & Negretti, R. (2024). Conceptualising and cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in doctoral academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 66, Article 101156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101156
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pham Bich, T., & Pham Dao, T. (2024). Empowering Student Research with Artificial Intelligence: Transforming Education through AI Applications. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(15s), 734–741. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i15s.2514
Pham Bich Thuy, & Pham Dao Tien. (2025). Empowering student research with artificial intelligence: Transforming education through AI applications. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(15s), 734–741. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i15s.2514
Picciano, A. G. (2024). Graduate Teacher Education Students Use and Evaluate ChatGPT as an Essay-Writing Tool. Online Learning Journal, 28(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4373
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future, 5(11), 1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632
Prandner, D., Wetzelhütter, D., & Hese, S. (2025). ChatGPT as a data analyst: an exploratory study on AI-supported quantitative data analysis in empirical research. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1417900. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1417900
Pratami, S., Eryansyah, & Vianty, M. (2025). AI Paraphrasing Tools in EFL Undergraduate Thesis Writing: Students’ Perceptions and Influential Factors. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v9i1.86696
Pratiwi, H., Suherman, Hasruddin, & Ridha, M. (2025). Between Shortcut and Ethics: Navigating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing Among Indonesian Doctoral Students. European Journal of Education, 60(2), Article e70083. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70083
Rababah, L. M., Rababah, M. A., & Naji Al-Khawaldeh, N. (2024). Graduate students' ChatGPT experience and perspectives during thesis writing. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48395
Rodafinos, A. (2025). The Integration of Generative AI Tools in Academic Writing: Implications for Student Research. Social Education Research, 6(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.6220256517
Roman-Acosta, D. D., Rodríguez Torres, E., Baquedano Montoya, M. B., López Zavala, L. C., & Pérez Gamboa, A. J. (2024). ChatGPT and its use to improve academic writing in postgraduate students. Praxis Pedagógica, 24(36), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto.praxis.24.36.2024.53-75
Sar?ca, T., & Deneme Genço?lu, S. (2025). EFL students’ perceptions of AI-assisted writing tools: A systematic narrative hybrid review. The Literacy Trek, 11(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1669804
Shaffril, H. A. M., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality and Quantity, 55, 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
Sharma, A., Rao, P., Ahmed, M. Z., & Chaturvedi, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: opportunities and ethical considerations. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 13(1), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20244167
Sircar, A., Yadav, K., Rayavarapu, K., Bist, N., & Oza, H. (2021). Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry. Petroleum Research, 6(4), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.009
Suglo, E. K., Mejira, A., Bayor, N., Nyemewero, I., & Godfred, A. A. (2024). Integrating Generative AI in Contemporary Research Writing: Exploring Postgraduates’ Knowledge and Willingness to Use GenAI in the Upper East Region of Ghana. American Journal of Technology, 3(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.58425/ajt.v3i1.301
Sytnyk, O., Knyrik, N., Tiutiunnyk, O., Bazinyan, Y., & Tsepkalo, T. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence algorithms on automatic editing and proofreading of texts. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 103(22), 9604–9615. https://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol103No22/29Vol103No22.pdf
Tlali, T., Chere-Masopha, J., Sebatane, E., & Khalanyane, T. (2022). Challenges Confronting Postgraduate Supervision at the National University of Lesotho: Supervisors’ Perspectives. International Journal of African Higher Education, 9(22), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v9i2.15367
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2021). The sustainable development goals report 2021. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/
United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations. https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unga/2015/en/111816
Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article e450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
Van de Schoot, R., Messina Coimbra, B., Evenhuis, T., Lombaers, P., Weijdema, F., de Bruin, L., Neeleman, R., Grandfield, E., Sijbrandij, M., Teijema, J. J., Jalsovec, E., Bron, M. P., Winter, S., de Bruin, J., & van Zuiden, M. (2025). The hunt for the last relevant paper: blending the best of humans and AI. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 16(1), Article 2546214. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2546214
Veckalne, R., & Tambovceva, T. (2022). The Role of Digital Transformation in Education in Promoting Sustainable Development. Virtual Economics, 5(4), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.04(4)
Vieno, K., Rogers, K. A., & Campbell, N. (2022). Broadening the Definition of ‘Research Skills to Enhance Students’ Competence across Undergraduate and master’s Programs. Education Sciences, 12(10), Article 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100642
Wang, C. (2025). Exploring Students’ Generative AI-Assisted Writing Processes: Perceptions and Experiences from Native and Nonnative English Speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 1825–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3
Wang, S., Scells, H., Koopman, B., & Zuccon, G. (2023). Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1426–1436. https://doi.org/10.1145/3539618.3591703
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, Article 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, Indrawati, I., Rusdin, D., Ivone, F. M., Basthomi, Y., & Zulfahreza. (2024). Revolutionizing EFL writing unveiling the strategic use of ChatGPT by Indonesian master’s students. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2399431. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2399431
Whittemore, R., & Kna?, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Xiao Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on L2 writing and expected responses: Voice from doctoral students. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 13201–13219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12397-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohamad Lukman Al Hakim Md. Noor, Muhammad Aiman Isa, Muhammad Sabri Sahrir, Mohd. Feham Md Ghalib
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
