Teacher–Student Interactions in Face-to-Face and Online Learning: A Sociocultural Case Study in Malaysian Higher Education
Keywords:
teacher–student interactions; online learning; face-to-face learning; sociocultural theory; higher educationAbstract
This study problematizes the way teacher–student interactions in higher education change as teachers and students transition from face-to-face to fully online learning. By using a qualitative case study conducted over six months at a Malaysian public university, audio-recorded and observational data were gathered from two instructors and approximately 70 students, including interviews with 10 selected participants. Findings show that face-to-face instruction offered structured guidance, immediate feedback, and rich interaction, which supported deeper engagement and learning. In contrast, fully online environments relied heavily on one-way delivery and asynchronous activities, which maintained access but limited dialogic exchange and self-regulated learning. These results suggest that online learning, while necessary for continuity, is not a complete substitute for in-person interaction, because it risks diminishing comprehension and outcomes related to critical thinking. These insights prompt critical questions about how teacher–student dynamics influence learning experiences and outcomes, particularly for achieving equitable education under Sustainable Development Goal 4. The study underscores the need for institutional readiness, particularly for policies and infrastructure that support effective digital pedagogy, and highlights the importance of teacher training for designing blended, interactive, feedback-rich online environments. It also calls for sensitivity to the cultural–technical interplay that shapes how educators and students navigate digital spaces, by ensuring that technology enhances rather than replaces the social dimensions of learning.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.12.26
References
Ampo, W. M., Rullen, M. S. M., Deguit, E. O., Perocho, R. V., & Romero, P. J. B. (2025). From traditional school to virtual classroom: Students’ lived experiences on blended learning implementation. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.2.1
Antón, M. (1999). A learner-centered classroom. Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 303—318. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00024
Awang, M., & Sinnadurai, S. K. (2011). A study on the development of strategic tools in study orientation skills towards achieving academic excellence. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.60-67
Bahar, N., Wahab, S. N., & Ahmad, N. D. (2020). Understanding challenges faced in online teaching and learning among Malaysian universities’ instructors during COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020 Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (econf) (pp. 154–157). https://doi.org/10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385474
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
Burns, B. (2024, September 14). ‘Furious’: Adelaide University becomes first major Aussie uni to ditch face-to-face lectures. News.com.au. https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/careers/furious-adelaide-university-becomes-first-major-aussie-uni-to-ditch-facetoface-lectures/news-story/fa62e5dcad7006a2f980df5c5bf027e3?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Cortazzi, M. (1998). Learning from Asian lessons: Cultural expectations and classroom talk. Education 3-13, 26(2), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279885200201
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: A qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374772
Frøytlog, J. I. J., & Rasmussen, I. (2020). The distribution and productivity of whole-class dialogues: Exploring the potential of microblogging. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, Article 101501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101501
Furberg, A. (2016). Teacher support in computer-supported lab work: Bridging the gap between lab experiments and students’ conceptual understanding. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 89?113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9229-3
Furberg, A., & Arnseth, H. C. (2009). Reconsidering conceptual change from a socio-cultural perspective: Analyzing students’ meaning making in genetics in collaborative learning activities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(1), 157?191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9161-6
Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). Students’ meaning?making of socio?scientific issues in computer mediated settings: exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1775?1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701543617
Galton, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the primary classroom. Sage.
Händel, M., Stephan, M., Glaser-Zikuda, M., Kopp, B., Bedenlier, S., & Ziegler, A. (2020). Digital readiness and its effects on higher education students’ socio-emotional perceptions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/b9pg7
Jamil, N. J., Rashid, R. A., Sahib, F. H., Ahmad, M., Abd. Kadir, K., Ibrahim, S. H., Yusof, C. M. Y., Mamat, R., Paee, R., & Cho, M. S. (2024). Bridging gaps in online Arabic language instruction: Addressing key challenges in higher education institutions. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI122024-8
Kharroubi, S., & ElMediouni, A. (2024). Conceptual review: Cultivating learner autonomy through self-directed learning & self-regulated learning: A socio-constructivist exploration. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1649
Knain, E., Fredlund, T., & Furberg, A. (2021). Exploring student reasoning and representation construction in school science through the lenses of social semiotics and interaction analysis. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 93?111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09975-1
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Meng, W., Yu, L., Liu, C., Pan, N., Pang, X., & Zhu, Y. (2024). A systematic review of the effectiveness of online learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1334153. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1334153
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353?369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902954273
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Mokhtar, A. (2018). Breaking barriers through Edmodo: A qualitative approach on the perceptions of University of Malaya undergraduates. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1026
Park, C. C. (2000). Learning style preferences of Southeast Asian students. Urban Education, 35(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085900353002
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Both sides of the conversation: The interplay between mediation and learner reciprocity in dynamic assessment. In J. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 33–57). Equinox.
Polujanski, S., Schindler, A. K., & Rotthoff, T. (2020). Academic-associated emotions before and during the COVID-19-related online semester—a longitudinal investigation of first-year medical students. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 37(7). https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001370
Ramburuth, P., & McCormick, J. (2001). Learning diversity in higher education: A comparative study of Asian international and Australian students. Higher Education, 42(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017982716482
Saljo, R. (2023). Learning in educational settings: What classics can teach us about the value of attending to participant perspectives in social practices. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 9(2), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.3384/confero.2001-4562.231217
Shi, Y., Zhang, Z., Cao, S., & Liu, Q. (2024). Dialogic teaching of controversial issues: Discursive moves to enact two-sided discussions. Language and Education, 38(2), 303?319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2240292
Silseth, K., & Furberg, A. (2024). Bridging group work and whole-class activities through responsive teaching in science education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(3), 2155–2176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00770-w
Stark, S., & Torrance, H. (2005). Case study. In B. Somech, & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 33–40). Sage.
Strømme, T. A., & Furberg, A. (2015). Exploring teacher intervention in the intersection of digital resources, peer collaboration, and instructional design. Science Education, 99(5), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21181
Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55, 661?699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00320.x
United Nations. (2023). Goal 4 – Quality Education. Department of Global Communications. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Goal-4_Fast-Facts.pdf
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
Van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206?239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). Plenum.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56?74). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174299.004
Wong, R. (2020). When no one can go to school: Does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs? Interactive learning environments, 37(1), 1?17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789672
Wursten, H., & Jacobs, C. (2013). The impact of culture on education. The Hofstede Centre, Itim International.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Farha Alia Mokhtar, Saba Arshad, Nur Jannah Jamil, Muhamad Khairul Zakaria, Che Wan Rahimah Che Wan Ibrahim, Chaizani Mohd Shamsudin, Syuhaida Mohamed@Jaafar, Shamsudin Awang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
