Social Interaction between Lecturers and Undergraduates in EFL Classrooms: A Case Study from a Thai University in the Age of AI
Keywords:
AI in EFL; lecturer–student interaction; social interaction; hybrid interaction modelAbstract
This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping social interactions in Thai EFL classrooms amid the rapid spread of chatbots and AI-supported writing tools in language education (2020–2025). Grounded in Sociocultural Theory and the Interaction Hypothesis, the design combined a questionnaire administered across four undergraduate year levels with semi-structured interviews of eight purposively selected students. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey responses, while the interview data was analysed thematically. The findings show that students welcome AI for quick access to input, idea generation, and building confidence before speaking yet remain cautious about accuracy and overreliance, and many still prefer lecturer clarification for complex issues. A new contribution emerges in the form of a dual effect: pre-class AI preparation enables students to enter lessons better prepared and more confident, but it is also associated with fewer spontaneous in-class clarification questions, suggesting a subtle displacement of routine lecturer–student interaction. While AI can stimulate participation and reduce hesitation, it cannot replace teacher guidance, formative feedback, and relational rapport. Overall, the evidence supports a hybrid interaction model in which AI-supported preparation is paired with human-led dialogue during class. Implications extend beyond ZPD and the negotiation of meaning toward a whole-class ecology: brief, transparent rules for responsible AI use (verification and disclosure), protection of talk time through AI-off/AI-critique moments, and process-oriented assessment that includes light evidence of AI use and short reflections on revisions. Program-level alignment (equity safeguards, approved tools, and privacy/ethics policies) is recommended to keep expectations consistent. By documenting both the benefits and displacement risks of pre-class AI use, this study refines the sociocultural theory for the AI era. It offers scalable guidance for EFL programs in Thailand and across Asia.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.12.3
References
Ampo, W. M. G., Ayuban, A. R., Avellaneda, S. L. A., & Go, D. T. (2025). Exploring teachers’ lived experiences in integrating ChatGPT in classroom practices. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.1.2
Ampo, W. M. G., Rullen, M. S. M., Deguit, E. O., Perocho, R. V., & Romero, P. J. B. (2025). From traditional school to virtual classroom: Students’ lived experiences on blended learning implementation. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.2.1
Al?Zahrani, A. M. (2024). Unveiling the shadows: Beyond the hype of AI in education. Heliyon, 10(9), e30696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30696
Aliakbari, M., Barzan, P., & Sayyadi, M. (2025). Exploring the impact of AI chatbots on EFL learners’ conversational proficiency. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in English Language Communication, 1(2), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.30470/IRELC.2025.2058800.1022.
Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17). 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178427
Boonchom, W., Piyanukool, S., & Prachanant, N. (2024). Trends of using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in research studies of English language teaching. BRU ELT Journal, 2(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.14456/bej.2024.3
Bringula, R. P., Batalla, M. Y. C., Moraga, S. D., Ochengco, L. D. R., Ohagan, K. N., & Lansigan, R. R. (2012). School choice of computing students: A comparative perspective from two universities. Creative Education, 3(6), 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.4236/CE.2012.326161
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2023). The AI revolution in education: Will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education? arXiv.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185
Cordova, M. M., & Pantao, J. G. (2025). Analyzing the post-pandemic working conditions and behavioral adjustment of teachers in IPED schools using Theory of Work Adjustment. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(2), 16-41. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.2.2
Duong, T., & Chen, H. (2025). An AI chatbot for EFL writing: Students’ usage tendencies writing performance, and perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241312363
Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence?mediated interactions. System, 121, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103254
Farrelly, M. J., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2021). Strategies used and challenges faced by Thai EFL teachers when eliciting talk during classroom interactions in high school contexts. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211050385
Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903564362
Grab, M. Ö. (2025). Integrated AI chatbot practice: A pathway to improved ESL speaking skills. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101933
Hsiao, J. C. (2024). Enhancing EFL reading and writing through AI?powered tools: Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online course. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 1650–1671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2207187
Hsu, Y. C., & Ching, Y. H. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence in education, Part One: The dynamic frontier. TechTrends, 67(4), 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00863-9
Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The predicting role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ willingness to communicate an academic engagement. BMC Psychology, 11, 318. Https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01378-x
Huang, F., & Zou, B. (2024). English speaking with artificial intelligence (AI): The roles of enjoyment, willingness to communicate with AI, and innovativeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108355
Karel, E., Defourny, C., Keppens, G., Graczyk, P. A., Sauter, F., & Heyne, D. (2025). School-based support for emotion-related attendance challenges: effectiveness of@ School when implemented with neurodiverse adolescents, their parents, and school staff. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1613712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1613712
Jiang, R. (2022). How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401
Karim, A., Khemanuwong, T., Ferdous, T., Humaira, T., Sultana, S., & Ismail, S. A. M. M. (2024). Do gender, socioeconomic status and regional difference predict the reading comprehension of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners?. MEXTESOL Journal, 48(4), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v48n4-5
Kearney, C. A., Dupont, R., Fensken, M., & Gonzálvez, C. (2023). School attendance problems and absenteeism as early warning signals: Review and implications for health-based protocols and school-based practices. Frontiers in Education, 8(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1253595
Kim, H., Cha, Y., & Kim, N. Y. (2021). Effects of AI chatbots on EFL students’ communication skills. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21. 712-734. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21.202108.712
Kilickaya, F., & Kic-Drgas, J. (2024). The role of AI chatbots in self-regulated blended learning: Benefits and challenges. International Journal on E-Learning, 23(4). 429-441. https://doi.org/10.70725/174580yctggc
Klímová, B, & Ibna Seraj, B. (2023). The use of chatbots in university EFL settings: Research trends and pedagogical implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. 1-7. Https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131506
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Krasaesom, T., Jeanmano, W., Sompen, U., & Watcharenwong, P. (2023). Using AI platforms toward English language learning: A case study of English program students. BRU ELT Journal, 1(3), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.14456/bej.2023.21
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
Latif, M. W., & Wasim, A. (2024). Investigating EFL instructors’ approaches to classroom-based assessment culture: An explanatory sequential mixed-method approach. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00332-x
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Saksono, S. T., Hanifa, S., Inayati, R., Harits, I. W., Suryani, S., Roifah, M., & Puspitasi, D. (2025). A dialogic path to literary mastery: Implementing Socratic seminar in university-level literature classes. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.1.1
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
Songkhro, J. (2021). What really stops the 21st century Thai learners answering questions in EFL classrooms? Rangsit Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 89-105.
Tetteh, A. K., Amakye, E., Asori, C.A., Mohammed, U., & Roifah, M. (2025). Application of multimodal instructional technique in enhancing biology students’ understanding of concepts and retention of knowledge of photosynthesis in Nifa SHS, Ghana. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(3), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.1.3
Thadphoothon, J., & Samrit, J. (2025). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) applications for vocabulary learning among Thai university students: A case study. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 12(1), 112–122. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/280517
Wiboolyasarin, K., Kamonsawad, R., Jinowat, N., & Wiboolyasarin, W. (2022). EFL learners' preference for corrective feedback strategies in relation to their self-perceived levels of proficiency. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 5(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i1.4403
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nattana Boontong, Boonyarit Omanee, Ekkapon Phairot, Thapanee Khemanuwong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
