Investigating Critical Reading Strategies and Challenges among Thai EFL University Students: A Mixed-Methods Study

Authors

  • Phanlapa Khathayut

Keywords:

critical reading strategies; EFL learners in Thailand; higher education; reading comprehension; mixed-methods research

Abstract

English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education widely acknowledges the importance of critical reading strategies in fostering individual scholarship. The revised Bloom’s Taxonomy served as a framework for interpreting and exploring these issues. This study aims to identify and analyze critical reading strategies and their challenges among EFL students in Thailand. This research focuses on the critical reading strategies employed by 75 Thai third-year students majoring in English at a university in Songkhla Province, Thailand, as well as the challenges they faced when reading academic English texts. Using quantitative methods through questionnaires and statistical analysis, as well as qualitative methods through interviews and thematic analysis, the data was collected through surveys (n=75) and interviews (n=13). The results show the dominance of low-level strategies, and that the main difficulties are vocabulary and understanding complex texts. The students tended to rely on basic strategies, primarily those associated with lower-order thinking skills (e.g., highlighting key words and rereading for context comprehension), while neglecting higher-order strategies (e.g., evaluating credibility or synthesizing ideas). The exploratory factor analysis showed six components relating to higher-order thinking skills, especially “Analyzing” and “Evaluating,” based on the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Limited vocabulary knowledge hindered the students’ critical reading abilities, as they reported struggling with complex texts or lengthy passages. This research contributes to extending the literature regarding the critical reading strategies utilized by Thai EFL students. Curriculum designers and educators in higher education should create supportive learning environments both inside and outside classes that enhance Thai students’ critical literacy.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.12.2

References

Ampo, W. M. G., Rullen, M. S. M., Degui, E. O., Perocho, R. V., & Romero, P. J. B. (2025). From traditional school to virtual classroom: Students’ lived experiences on blended learning implementation. International Journal of Education and Emerging Practices, 1(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.63236/injeep.1.2.1

Apairach, S. (2023). Going the extra miles in a reading lesson: Insights from a Thai EFL classroom. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(1). 320-338. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/263444

Begunova, M. (2018). Critical reading strategies in teaching university students in non-linguistic environment. Web of Scholar, 4(2), 73-77. https://shorturl.asia/xqgsK

Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., & Kendeou P. (2020). Reading comprehension. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED608839.pdf

Catoto, J. S. (2024). Exploring interest through pleasure reading: The E-reading experiences of ESL learners. The New English Teacher, 18(2), 1-12. https://assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/7635/4051

Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A case study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627

EF Education First. (2023). English proficiency index. https://www.ef.co.th/epi/regions/asia/thailand/

Em, S., & Khampirat, B. (2025). Exploring the motivation for English reading among Cambodian undergraduates: A cross-sectional study. The New English Teacher, 19(2), 88-102. https://assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/8385/4513

Emilia, E., Siagian, E. N. M., Novianti, N., Dwiyana. Rina, Muniroh, R. D., & Fikrianto, M. (2025). Unveiling English language education policies across primary and secondary levels in ASEAN. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 484-495. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.75898

Ennis, R. S. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical reading skills. https://jgregorymcverry.com/readings/ennis1985assessingcriticalthinking.pdf

Fraser, C. (2024). Academic writing for success--Canadian edition 2.0. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/academicwritingsuccessc2/chapter/post-secondary-reading-and-writing/

Goatly, A. (2000). Critical reading and writing: An introductory coursebook. Routledge.

Ha Van Le, Thi, A. D. N., Dinh, H. N. L., Phuong, U. N. & Thi, T. A. N. (2024). Unveiling critical reading strategies and challenges: a mixed methods study among English major students in a Vietnamese higher education institution. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2326732. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2326732

Juliana, J., & Anggraini, R. (2024). Metacognitive reading comprehension instructional model on narrative text: A mixed method for enhancing students’ comprehension. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language. 6(1). 1-15. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.vxxx

Kazazoglu, S. (2022). Promoting critical thinking in ELT classes. In S. Kazazoglu (Eds), Critical reading and writing in the 21st century (pp.1-21). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Khamkhong, S. (2018). Developing English L2 critical reading and thinking skills through the PISA reading literacy assessment framework: A case study of Thai EFL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3). 83-94. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-07

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://cmapspublic2.ihmc.us/rid=1Q2PTM7HL-26LTFBX-9YN8/Krathwohl%202002.pdf

Maab, S. H., Ramadhanti, S.F., Payung, N. F., & Yulia, Y. (2024). Critical thinking in academic reading: EFL students’ perceptions and challenges. VELES Journal, 8(1), 206-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25096

Maulida, R. D. (2025). The implementation of critical reading techniques towards the 2024 presidential election news. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 7(1). 40-53.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4

Morsi, W. K. & Rezk, W. (2025). Advancing literary interpretation via critical reading proficiency: A sustainable EFL framework for generation Z. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(2), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1502.02

Namsaeng, P., & Sukying, A. (2021). The effect of group reading strategy on critical thinking skills in Thai EFL university learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 30-40. http://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.2.4

NIETS (National Institute of Education Testing Service). (2023). NIETS data catalog. https://catalog.niets.or.th/group/examresult

Nguyen, T. L. P., & Nguyen, V. N. (2024). Effects of strategy-based instruction on Vietnamese EFL college students’ reading comprehension: A mixed method approach. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 3(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24314

Punkasirikul, P. (2020). English reading comprehension. Textbook Development Project. Khon Kaen University.

Ratanaruamkarn, S., Piyanukool, S., & Nuemaihom, A. (2023). Trends in teaching critical reading in the Thai context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(2), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1302.17

Rovinelli, R.J. and Hambleton, R.K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Tijdschrift Voor Onderwijs Research, 2(2), 49-60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED121845.pdf

Rosano, D. A., Conjusta, G. R., Gallardo, J. B., & Sindingan, L. F. (2025). Teaching remedial reading: Content area teachers’ difficulties and needs. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.8

Rungswang, A., & Kosashunhanan, K. (2021). The problem of using English reading strategies perceived by Thai EFL students: Implications for reading instructions. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(4), 496-505. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1248

Shamida, A., Sidhu, G. K., Kamil, S., & Du, R. (2023). EFL students’ perspectives and challenges in critical reading skills for post graduate study. AcE-Bs2023 Kuala Terengganu: 11th ASIAN Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, Primula Beach Hotel, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia 14-16 July 2023.

Sirisitthimahachon, K. (2018). Teaching critical thinking in the 21st century learning process towards assessments for development. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 38(3), 106–119. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/utccjournalhs/article/view/158060

Wallace, M. & Wray, A. (2011). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. (2nd ed.). MPG Books Group.

Wichanee, T., & Thongrin, S. (2024). Critical consciousness development through teaching English reading: A context of EFL students in Thailand’s northeastern area. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 440-466. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1415598.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Khathayut, P. . (2025). Investigating Critical Reading Strategies and Challenges among Thai EFL University Students: A Mixed-Methods Study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(12), 18–42. Retrieved from https://ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2612