A Systematic Review of Interventions Improving University Students’ EFL Writing Competence
Keywords:Interventions; University students; English as a Foreign Language; writing competence
Writing competence in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) is a critical skill for university students, as it affects their academic and career success. However, many EFL university students are not capable of writing English compositions and face considerable challenges in developing their writing skills. To address these challenges, various interventions have been proposed, yet few studies have integrated them in recent years. This study employed PRISMA guidelines to analyze forty-two empirical studies on interventions improving university students’ EFL writing competence based on peer-reviewed journals published between 2012 and 2022. The review identified the types of interventions, evaluated their effectiveness in improving students' writing competence, and provided recommendations for teachers and future researchers. Findings showed that teaching instruction, feedback, cooperative learning and modern technology were applied into teaching activities, which improved university students’ EFL writing competence to various degrees. Teachers are required to select suitable interventions or combine different interventions to help university students to effectively solve problems in English writing. Furthermore, the findings will make a contribution to understanding recent interventions in EFL writing instruction in university settings, providing a reference for educators to develop evidence-based practices to enhance university students’ EFL writing competence.
Abbas, S. H., & Al-bakri, S. A. (2018). The effect of pair writing technique on Iraqi EFL university students' writing performance and anxiety. Arab World English Journal, 9(2), 23-37. http://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.2
Akbar, M., Pathan, H., & Ali Shah, S. W. (2018). Problems affecting L2 learners’ English writing skills: A study of public sector colleges Hyderabad city, Sindh, Pakistan. Language in India, 18(5), 7–26.
Alawerdy, A. S., & Alalwi, F. S. (2022). Enhancing English as a foreign language university students' writing through explicit instruction of conjunctions as cohesive devices: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1053310
Aldossary, K. S. (2021). The impact of collaborative writing on EFL learners' writing development: A longitudinal classroom-based study in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal, 12(3), 174-185. http://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no3.12
Alharthi, S. (2021). From instructed writing to free-writing: A study of EFL learners. SAGE Open, 11(1). doi:10.1177/21582440211007112
Andujar, A. (2016). Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing. System, 62, 63-76. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.004
Astrid, A., Marzulina, L., Erlina, D., Harto, K., Habibi, A., & Mukminin, A. (2019). Teaching writing to EFL student teachers: Teachers' intervention and no teachers' intervention through peer feedback writing techniques. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1901-1908. http://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070908
Azari, M. H. (2017). Effect of weblog-based process approach on EFL learners’ writing performance and autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 529-551. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1329214
Baghbadorani, E. A., & Roohani, A. (2014). The impact of strategy-based instruction on L2 learners’ persuasive writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 235-241. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.412
Barrot, J. S. (2020). Effects of Facebook-based e-portfolio on ESL learners' writing performance. Language, Culture & Curriculum, 34(1), 95-111. http://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1745822
Chatta, B. S., & Haque, M. I. (2020). Improving paragraph writing skills of Saudi EFL university students using flipped classroom instruction. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6). 228- 247. http://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.15
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Sustaining university English as a foreign language learners' writing performance through provision of comprehensive written corrective feedback. Sustainability, 13(15). http://doi.org/10.3390/su13158192
De Silva, R. (2015). Writing strategy instruction: Its impact on writing in a second language for academic purposes. LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 19(3), 301-323. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541738
Ebrahimi, M. R., Khoshsima, H., & Zare-Behtash, E. (2018). The impacts of emotional intelligence enhancement on Iranian intermediate EFL learners writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 437-452. http://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11130a
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1668-1706. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825097
Fu, Q.-K., Lin, C.-J., Hwang, G.-J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers and Education, 137, 59-77. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005
Fu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2022). Promoting L2 writing development via a concept-based approach to teaching genre: A sociocultural intervention study in Chinese EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research. http://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221114363
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Portsmouth, N. H: Heinemann.
Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in Grades 4–6: A national survey. Chicago Journals, 110(4), 494–518. http://doi.org/10.1086/651193
Ghouali, K., & Cecilia, R. R. (2021). Towards a Moodle-based assessment of Algerian EFL students' writing performance. Porta Linguarum, (36), 231-248. http://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.v0i36.17866
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. New York, NY: Longman.
Hashemnezhad, H. & Hashemnezhad, N. (2012). A Comparative Study of Product, Process, and Post-process Approaches in Iranian EFL Students' Writing Skill. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 722-729. http://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.722-72
Hanh, L. T. T., & Tinh, B. T. (2022). Applying peer-review checklist to improve Vietnamese EFL university students’ writing skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(5), 166-181. http://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.9
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1), 17-29. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
Ismail, N., Hussin, S., & Darus, S. (2012). The Effects of IQ-write program online composing guide towards ESL tertiary students' writing performance and interest. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 8(4), 107-117.
Jacobs, H. L., Zingraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., & Hartfiel, V. F. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley: Newbury House.
Johns, A. M. (Ed.). (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
Kang, N. (2019). Effectiveness of collocation learning through a web-concordancer in a Korean EFL university course. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 41-84. http://doi.org/10.15702/mall.2019.22.1.41
Karami, S., Sadighi, F., Bagheri, M. S., & Riasati, M. J. (2018). The potential impact of the application of electronic portfolio on Iranian EFL learners' writing performance seeking their gender role. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1-1. http://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1562509
Karami, S., Sadighi, F., Bagheri, M. S., & Riasati, M. J. (2019). The impact of application of electronic portfolio on undergraduate English majors' writing proficiency and their self-regulated learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1319-1334. http://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12184a
Khalil, E. R. (2018). Investigating the effect of FLOW teaching strategy on EFL learners’ writing achievements. Annals of the Faculty of Arts, 46(Part A), 73–133. https://search-ebscohost-com.libezp2.utar.edu.my/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=137964172&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Klimova, B. F. (2013). Approaches to the teaching of writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1149
Hupe, M. (2019). EndNote X9. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 16(3–4), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2019.1691963
Li, H. H., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Effects of structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions on Chinese university EFL students' individual writing: A quasi-experimental study. PLoS ONE, 16(5): e0251569. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251569
Lin, C.-J., Huang, G.-J., Fu, Q.-K., & Chen, J.-F. (2018). A flipped contextual game-based learning approach to enhancing EFL students' English business writing performance and reflective behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 117-131.
Luo, Q. (2016). The effects of data-driven learning activities on EFL learners' writing development. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1-13. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2935-5
Makmur., Mukminin, A., Ismiyati, Y., & Verawati. (2016). In search of good student teachers in writing skill: The impact of different task variance of EFL writing proficiency. International journal of academic research in education, 2(1). http://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.45901
Mazloomi, S., & Khabiri, M. (2018). The impact of self-assessment on language learners’ writing skill. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 55(1), 91-100. http://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1214078
Mekala, S., & Ponmani, M. (2017). The impact of direct written corrective feedback on low proficiency ESL learners' writing ability. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 11(4), 23-54. https://search-ebscohost-com.libezp2.utar.edu.my/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=127283084&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaf, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269. http://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Mukminin, A., Ali, R. M., & Ashari, M. J. F. (2015). Voices from within: Student teachers’ experiences in English academic writing socialization at one Indonesian teacher training program. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1394-1407. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss9/2
Naghdipour, B., & Koc, S. (2015). The evaluation of a teaching intervention in Iranian EFL writing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 389-398. doi:10.1007/s40299-014-0191-4
Nassar, H. M., & Al Tameemy, F. A. (2021). The impact of written peer feedback on the writing skills of EFL university students in Yemen. Asian ESP Journal, 17(2), 290-311. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85101933327&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=The+Impact+of+Written+Peer+Feedback+on+the+Writing+Skills+of+EFL+University+Students+in+Yemen&sid=ea3e92d9c12e96d61e5b6931d3362921&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=108&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28The+Impact+of+Written+Peer+Feedback+on+the+Writing+Skills+of+EFL+University+Students+in+Yemen%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=
Nordin, S., & Mohammad, N. (2006). The best of two approaches: Process/genre-based approach to teaching writing. Universiti Teknologi, Petronas
Nusrat, A., Ashraf, F., Khan, S., Aziz, S., & Jabeen, R. (2019). Is indirect written feedback valuable? A study targeting ESL university students in Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(5), 340-350. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p340
Paltridge, B. (2004). Approaches to teaching second language writing. University of Sydney, Adelaide.
Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The effects of collaborative writing on students' writing fluency: An efficient framework for collaborative writing. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021998363
Selvaraj, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). Systematic review: Approaches in teaching writing skill in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 450-473. doi:10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6564
Silva, T. (1997). On the ethical treatment of ESL writers. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 359-363. http://doi.org/10.2307/3588052
Sun, B., & Fan, T. (2022). The effects of an AWE-aided assessment approach on business English writing performance and writing anxiety: A contextual consideration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 72, 101123. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101123
Suthiwartnarueput, T., & Ratanakul, S. (2018). Using Line as an alternative channel for improving English writing ability of Thai EFL students. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia, 16(1), 46-69.
Swamy, B. C., Haque, M. I., Koppada, V., & Kumar, N. S. (2019). The effect of conducting De Bono's six thinking hats activity on developing paragraph writing skills of university students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), 186-197. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p186
Tang X. (2012). Discussion on the improvement of college English writing classroom teaching. Journal of Changchun Normal University, 31(11), 170-171.
Torto, G. A. (2014). An examination of the approaches adopted by English language teachers in teaching composition writing in cape coast basic schools, Ghana. Language in India, 14(1), 117-138. http://languageinindia.com/jan2014/examinationghana.pdf
Truong, H. M. (2022). Impacts of process-genre approach on EFL sophomores' writing performance, writing self-efficacy, writing autonomy. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 181-195. http://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12165
Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221. 2014.881386
Xu, Y. (2021). Investigating the effects of digital multimodal composing on Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance: A quasi-experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1945635
Yang, L. F., Liu, Y., & Xu, Z. (2022). Examining the effects of self-regulated learning-based teacher feedback on English-as-a-foreign-language learners' self-regulated writing strategies and writing performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1027266. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027266
Zaghlool, Z. D. (2020). The impact of using CALL online writing activities on EFL university students’ writing achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 141-148. doi:10.17507/tpls.1002.01
Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2014). The effect of computer assisted language learning on the development of EFL learners’ writing skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1975-1982. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.631
Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2015). The impact of computer-based instruction on the development of EFL learners' writing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 516-528. doi:10.1111/jcal.12100
Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2021). Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 101043. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043
Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Fostering stance-taking as a sustainable goal in developing EFL students' academic writing skills: Exploring the effects of explicit instruction on academic writing skills and stance deployment. Sustainability, 13(8). http://doi.org/10.3390/su13084270
Zhou, C. (2018). Empirical study on the effectiveness of teaching model of college English writing within blended learning mode. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5), 1060-1076. http://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.5.009
Copyright (c) 2023 Dandan Zhang, Joanna Tjin Ai Tan, Swagata Sinha Roy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).