Polymer Science in Action: Transforming the Learning Experience for Undergraduates with Active Learning Strategies


  • Chaninan Pruekpramool
  • Theerapong Sangpradit
  • Panitarn Wanakamol
  • Supitcha Supansomboon


active learning; undergraduate students; action research; practical guidelines


Active learning is a powerful teaching and learning approach that enhances students' capacity to construct understanding and apply their knowledge in real-world contexts. However, in university science classes, lectures remain the predominant method employed by instructors, primarily due to time constraints and limited familiarity with active learning strategies. This study aimed to explore practical guidelines for implementing active learning in undergraduate polymer science classrooms, as well as the perspectives of instructors and students on this approach and student satisfaction with active learning. The research involved two instructors and 34 second-year students from the Faculty of Science at a university based in Bangkok, Thailand. Data were collected through classroom observation, a student satisfaction questionnaire, and instructor and student interviews. Data were analyzed quantitatively, using means and standard deviations, as well as qualitatively, using content analysis. The study identified four practical guidelines for implementing active learning in the undergraduate polymer science classroom, which are: using a variety of active learning strategies and techniques that match the nature of students; providing helpful learning media and technology; using higher-level questioning to promote thinking processes; and linking authentic assessment and constructive feedback with real-life situations. These four guidelines proved effective for both on-site and online forms of learning. Furthermore, the students expressed very high satisfaction levels (M = 4.64, SD = 0.49) and positive opinions regarding active learning. 



Al-Rawi, I. (2013). Teaching methodology and its effects on quality learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(6),100-105.

Baken, E. K., Adams, D. C., & Rentz, M. S. (2022). Jigsaw method improves learning and retention for observation-based undergraduate biology laboratory activities. Journal of Biological Education, 56(3), 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1796757

Bi, M., Zhao, Z., Yang, J., & Wang, Y. (2019). Comparison of case-based learning and traditional method in teaching postgraduate students of medical oncology. Medical Teacher, 4(10), 1124-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1617414

Cho, J., & Baek, W. (2019). Identifying factors affecting the quality of teaching in basic science education: Physics, biological sciences, mathematics, and chemistry. Sustainability, 2019(11), 3958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143958

Clark, T. M. (2023). Narrowing achievement gaps in general chemistry courses with and without in-class active learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 100, 1494-1504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00973

Cole, A. W., Lennon, L., & Weber, N. L. (2021). Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 866-880. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593

Cooper, K. M., Jeffrey, N. S., & Tanner, K. D. (2021). Reconsidering the share of a think–pair–share: Emerging limitations, alternatives, and opportunities for research. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0200

Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(23), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6

Downing, V. R., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., Gin, L. E., & Brownell, S.E. (2020). Fear of negative evaluation and student anxiety in community college active-learning science courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-09-0186

Effendi, D. (2021). Implementation of role-playing active learning to increase student learning outcomes on the digestive system materials. International Journal of English Education and Research, 1(2), 116-126.

Giray, L. (2022). Meet the centennials: Understanding the generation Z students. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 2(4), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.26

Hao, Q., Barnes, B., & Jing, M. (2021). Quantifying the effects of active learning environments: separating physical learning classrooms from pedagogical approaches. Learning Environments Research, 24, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09320-3

Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). Identifying feedback that has impact. In: Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Molley, E. (eds). The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp.15–34.

Healy, M., Hammer, S., & McIlveen, P. (2020). Mapping graduate employability and career development in higher education research: A citation network analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 47(4), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1804851

Heck, A. J., Cross, C. E., Tatum, V. Y., & Chase, A.J. (2023). Active learning among health professions’ educators: Perceptions, barriers, and use. Medical Science Educator, 33, 719-727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01793-0

Hodges, L.C. (2020). Student engagement in active learning classes. In: Mintzes, J. J., Walter, E. M. (eds) Active Learning in College Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_3

Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education-A case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198

Johannes, C., & Haase, A. (2022). The impact of feedback mode on learning gain and self-efficacy: A quasi-experimental study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221131970

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Waurn Ponds: Deakin University Press.

Kim, A. M., Speed, C. J., & Macualay, J.O. (2019). Barriers and strategies: Implementing active learning in biomedical science lectures. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21190

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed). California, CA: Sage Publications.

Minick, W., Cekada, T., Marin, L., Zreiqat, M., Seal, B., & Mulroy, J. (2022). The impact of active learning strategies on retention and outcomes in safety training. Creative Education, 13(2), 526-536. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.132031

Mosca, J. B., Curtis, K. P., & Savoth, P. G. (2019). New approaches to learning for generation Z. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(3), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.33423/jbd.v19i3.2214

Nardo, J. E., Chapman, N. C., Shi, E. Y., Wieman, C., & Salehi, S. (2022). Perspectives on active learning: challenges for equitable active learning implementation. Journal of Chemical Education, 99, 1691-1699. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01233

Odebiyi, O. M. (2022). Mobilizing teacher candidates’ pedagogical design capacity for implementing inquiry-oriented lessons. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4257902

Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., & Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education, 20, 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1

Perasso, J. A., & Dominguez, A. (2023). Students’ perception of active learning in the acoustic physics course. 2023 Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore Convention Center June 25-28, 2023. American Society for Engineering Education.

Sandrone, S., Scott, G., Andersen, W. J., & Musunuru, K. (2021). Active learning-based STEM education for in-person and online learning. Cell Leading Edge, 184, 1409-1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.045

Schmidt, H.G., Wagener, S.L., Smeets, G. A. C. M., Keemink, L.M., & Van der Molen, H.T. (2015). On the use and misuse of lectures in higher education. Health Professions Education, 1, 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2015.11.010

Sekwena, G. L. (2023). Active learning pedagogyfor enriching economics students’higher orderthinking skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.15

Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sokhanvar, Z., Salehi, K., & Sokhanvar, F. (2021). Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101030

Stecula, K., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Advantages and disadvantages of E-Learning innovations during COVID-19 pandemic in higher education in Poland. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030159

Strubbe, L. E., Stang, J., Holland, T., Sherman, S. B., & Code, W. J. (2019). Faculty adoption of active learning strategies via paired teaching: Conclusions from two science departments. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(1), 31–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26901347

Tatto, M. T., (2021). Professionalism in teaching and the role of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 20-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1849130

Vereijken, M. W. C., & Rijst, R. M. (2021). Subject matter pedagogy in university teaching: how lecturers use relations between theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(4), 880-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863352

Waldrop, M. M. (2015). The science of teaching science. Nature, 523, 272-274.

Yates, J., & Hirsh, W. (2022). One-to-one career conversations in UK higher education: practical approaches and professional challenges. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(9), 1304-1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2072195