Growth Mindset in Teaching: A Case Study of a Finnish Elementary School Teacher

Authors

  • Rina Ronkainen
  • Elina Kuusisto
  • Kirsi Tirri

Keywords:

Growth mindset; growth mindset pedagogy; elementary school teacher; Finland

Abstract

This study investigates how a growth mindset is actualised in
one first-grade teacher’s classroom. Mindset refers to implicit beliefs
that individuals hold about basic human qualities. A person with a
growth mindset sees these qualities as malleable and subject to
development, whereas a person with a fixed mindset sees these
qualities as static and unalterable. Previous research has shown that
teachers’ mindsets have an influence on their pedagogical thinking and
practice. The data in this study include classroom observations,
videotaping and stimulated recall interviews. Deductive content
analysis was used in the inquiry. The teacher’s growth mindset
pedagogy was actualised with one student in particular when the
teacher gave critical feedback in the form of “not yet”. This gradually
changed the student’s fixed mindset behaviour towards a growth
mindset. The teacher’s growth mindset was also actualised in the class
as a whole when she fostered students’ process-focused thinking with
concrete and immediate praise, indicating her high expectations. The
teacher studied can be regarded as an example of a growth-mindset
teacher, and her actions and reflections on the teaching-studyinglearning                                                                                                  process provide illuminating examples of growth mindset
pedagogy in classroom interactions.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.8.9

References

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H. & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child development, 78(1), 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Boaler, J. (2015). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1080/14794802.2016.1237374

De Kraker-Pauw, E., Van Wesel, F., Krabbendam, L. & Van Atteveldt, N. (2017). Teacher mindsets concerning the malleability of intelligence and the appraisal of achievement in the context of feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01594

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. New York, London: Psychology Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

Dweck, C. S. (2010). Even geniuses work hard why foster a growth mindset ? Creating a culture of risk taking building a growth mindset. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 16-20.

Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.95.2.256

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Huang, L. S. (2014). Video-stimulated verbal recall: A method for researching cognitive processes and strategic behaviors. In SAGE Research Methods Cases. (pp. 1-22). London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/978144627305013508883

Kamins, M. L. & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835–847. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.35.3.835

Klem, A. M. & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of school health, 74(7), 262–273. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x

Kristjánsson, K. (2008). Education and selfâ€change. Cambridge journal of education, 38(2), 217–230. doi:10.1080/03057640802063320

Kuusisto, E., Laine, S. & Tirri, K. (2017). How do school children and adolescents perceive the nature of talent development ? A case study from Finland. Education Research International, 2017, 1–8. doi:10.1155/2017/4162957

Malinen, O. P., Väisänen, P. & Savolainen, H. (2012). Teacher education in Finland: a review of a national effort for preparing teachers for the future. Curriculum Journal, 23(4), 567–584. doi:10.1080/09585176.2012.731011

Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C. & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 1(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl013

National Core Curriculum for basic education. (2016). Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.

Paunesku, D. (2013). Scaled-up social psychology: Intervening wisely and broadly in education (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Rattan, A., Good, C. & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok - Not everyone can be good at mathâ€: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Hanhimäki, E. & Tirri, K. (2018a). Teachers’ implicit meaning systems and their implications for pedagogical thinking and practice: A case study from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(4), 487–500. doi:10.1080/00313831.2016.1258667

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Hanhimäki, E. & Tirri, K. (2018b). The implications of teachers’ implicit theories for moral education : A case study from Finland. Journal of Moral Education, 47(1), 62–76. doi:10.1080/03057240.2017.1374244

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Tuominen, M. & Tirri, K. (2019). In search of a growth mindset pedagogy : A case study of one teacher ’ s classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 204–213. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.002

Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: the Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171. doi:10.1080/02680930601158919

Sahlberg, P. (2014). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Schmidt, J. A., Shumow, L. & Kackar-Cam, H. (2015). Exploring teacher effects for mindset intervention outcomes in seventh-grade science classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(2), 17–32.

Soini, T., Pietarinen, J. & Pyhältö, K. (2016). What if teachers learn in the classroom ? Teacher Development, 20(3), 380-397. doi:10.1080/13664530.2016.1149511

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Tirri, K. (2014). The last 40 years in Finnish teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 600–609. doi:10.1080/02607476.2014.956545

Yeager, D. S. & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

Downloads

Published

2019-08-30