Enhancing Veterinary Anatomy Education Outcomes through a Multimodal, Student-Centered Approach
Keywords:
veterinary anatomy; digital education; multimodal learning; student-centered pedagogyAbstract
Veterinary anatomy education has traditionally relied on in-class lectures and cadaveric dissection labs. However, this approach is limited in accessibility and visualization of complex structures, raising ethical concerns regarding animal use and welfare. To address these challenges, we implemented a unique multimodal, student-centered teaching approach in two veterinary anatomy courses and explored its feasibility and impact. This approach integrated various digital resources (virtual flashcards, 3D anatomical models, educational websites, video demonstrations) and active learning strategies (peer instruction, collaborative learning, project-based learning, and guided pre-lab video preparation). The study involved 60 second-year veterinary students and employed a mixed-methods evaluation, combining student surveys and comparisons of exam performance with a previous cohort as a control. The results revealed overwhelmingly positive student feedback, with learners reporting enhanced understanding of anatomical concepts, increased engagement and motivation, and improved collaboration and communication skills. The multimodal group outperformed the traditional group with average exam scores increasing by 5–7 percentage points (p < 0.001). Survey results showed strong student approval, with 85–90% agreeing that interactive tools enhanced their learning. Implementing digital resources also allowed a ~20% reduction in the number of cadavers used, contributing to improved alignment with animal welfare principles. These findings underscore the effectiveness of a multimodal, student-centered approach in veterinary anatomy education, providing a more accessible, engaging, and effective learning experience while adhering to the 3Rs principles of animal welfare. This comprehensive approach reinforces content mastery and fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, and better prepares students for the dynamic landscape of veterinary medicine.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.6.7
References
Al Aiyan, A., & Balan, R. (2023). Mapping the branching pattern of the middle cerebral artery in the camel (Camelus dromedarius): A comprehensive anatomical analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1224197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1224197
Al Aiyan, A., Balan, R., Gebreigziabiher, S., Zerom, S., Mihreteab, Y., Ghebrehiwot, E., ... & Kishore, U. (2024). Comprehensive mapping of the exterior architecture of the dromedary camel brain. Scientific reports, 14(1), 2971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53541-y
Attardi, S. M., Barbeau, M. L., & Rogers, K. A. (2018). Improving online interactions: Lessons from an online anatomy course with a laboratory for undergraduate students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(6), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1776
Azer, S. A., & Azer, S. (2016). 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: A review of the quality of literature. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.05.002
Barmaki, R. L., Kim, K., Guo, Z., Wang, Q., Yu, K., Pearlman, R., & Navab, N. (2023). A large-scale feasibility study of screen-based 3d visualization and augmented reality tools for human anatomy education: exploring gender perspectives in learning experience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14383. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.14383
Bevis, A. J., Saadeh, K., Tse, G., & Jeevaratnam, K. (2023). Exploring UK veterinary students’ use of online resources as a tool for studying small animal internal medicine. Veterinary record, 192(3), e1799. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.1799
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
Hackmann, C. H., Dos Reis, D., & de Assis-Neto, A. C. (2019). Digital revolution in veterinary anatomy: Confection of anatomical models of canine stomach by scanning and three-dimensional printing (3D). International Journal of Morphology, 37(2), 486–490.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022019000200486
Iwanaga, J., Loukas, M., Dumont, A. S., & Tubbs, R. S. (2021). A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID?19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clinical Anatomy, 34(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23655
Kapoor, K., & Singh, A. (2022). Veterinary anatomy teaching from real to virtual reality: An unprecedented shift during COVID?19 in socially distant era. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 51(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12783
Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1297–1317. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1537
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
McLachlan, J. C., Bligh, J., Bradley, P., & Searle, J. (2004). Teaching Anatomy without cadavers. Medical Education, 38(4), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01795.x
Menon, P., Aldarwich, A., Hamdan, L., Hammoud, M., & Al Aiyan, A. (2021). Novel formaldehyde-free embalming fluid formulation for long-term preservation of cadavers for anatomy teaching. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 33(9), 718–725. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i9.2753
Muca, E., Cavallini, D., Raspa, F., Bordin, C., Bergero, D., & Valle, E. (2023). Integrating new learning methods into equine nutrition classrooms: The importance of students’ perceptions. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 126, 104537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104537
Petersson, H., Sinkvist, D., Wang, C., & Smedby, Ö. (2009). Web?based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.76
Prescott, M. J., Langermans, J. A., & Ragan, I. (2017). Applying the 3Rs to non-human primate research: Barriers and solutions. Drug Discovery Today: Disease Models, 23, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddmod.2017.11.001
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rauch, M., Bettermann, V., Tipold, A., Wissing, S., & Kleinsorgen, C. (2022). Use of actors or peers as simulated clients in veterinary communication training. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 50(3), 314-326. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2021-0055
Sadeghinezhad, J. (2023). Online veterinary anatomy education during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran: Challenges and opportunities. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1123
Schmidmaier, R., Ebersbach, R., Schiller, M., Hege, I., Holzer, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2011). Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: Retesting versus restudying. Medical Education, 45(11), 1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04043.x
Strza?ka, K., Mazurek, S., Wielgosz, M., Russek, P., Caputa, J., ?ukasik, D., ... & Wiatr, K. (2023). Using simulation to calibrate real data acquisition in veterinary medicine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11695. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11695
Vickrey, T., Rosploch, K., Rahmanian, R., Pilarz, M., & Stains, M. (2015). Research-based implementation of peer instruction: A literature review. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), es3. https://doi.org/ 10.1187/cbe.14-11-0198
Wainman, B., Aggarwal, A., Birk, S. K., Gill, J. S., Hass, K. S., & Fenesi, B. (2021). Virtual dissection: An interactive anatomy learning tool. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(6), 788–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2035
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Al Aiyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
