The Roles of Mediators and Moderators in the Adoption of Madrasati (M) LMS among Teachers in Riyadh

Authors

  • Hamad Alharbi
  • Habibah Ab Jalil
  • Muhd Khaizer Omar
  • Mohd Hazwan Mohd Puad

Keywords:

Adoption; M LMS; Mediator; Moderators; Teachers

Abstract

This study aims to determine the mediators’ and moderators’ roles in the adoption of the Madrasati (M) learning management system (LMS) among teachers in Riyadh. This study used the survey approach; it and involved 374 teachers, that use M LMS to deliver their instructions. The study’s samples represent the larger population of 13,782 public school teachers in Riyadh; 413 responses were collected after distributing 500 questionnaires. The independent variables are performance-expectancy (PE), effort-expectancy (EE), social-influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC); while Madrasati (M) LMS utilisation is the dependent variable. Meanwhile, behavioural intention serves as a moderator variable, while age and gender functions serve as mediators. This study discovered that behavioural intention, age, and gender all play mediating or moderating roles in M LMS utilisation among Riyadh teachers. In terms of mediation variables, this study found that the links between PE, SI, and FC and M LMS utilisation are significantly mediated by behavioural intention. However, there is no evidence that BI plays a moderating role in the relationship between EE and M LMS. Regarding age, all age groups’ moderating effects on M LMS- utilisations showed significant beta values, except on PE, which is not significant. However, EE had a substantially moderating effect on M LMS usage for teachers aged 30 and younger and teachers aged 31–40, while the beta values for teachers aged 41–50, and 51 and above, were not significant. It is suggested that future research should consider other variables, such as years of experience, which could influence the link between the variables and other components.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.6

References

Alahmari, A., & Kyei-Blankson, L. (2018). Comparing teacher experiences using a learning management system in K-12 schools in Saudi Arabia (3rd ed.). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3873-8.ch019

Albaqami, H. M. (2019). Preparing Pre-Service Teachers to Use Digital Visual Media for Twenty-First Century Teaching and Learning: Practices and Visions of Teacher Preparation Programs in Saudi Arabia. University of Northern Colorado. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/575/

Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9051-x

Al-Gahtani, S. S. (2016). Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001

Alghamdi, J., & Holland, C. (2020). A comparative analysis of policies, strategies and programmes for information and communication technology integration in education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the republic of Ireland. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4721–4745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10169-5

Alharbi, Saleh, and Steve Drew (2014). Using the technology-acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5, 143-155. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f996/9c881e6228723b0e6975abc190b30926d1ef.pdf

Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Alhajri, R., & Al-Sharhan, S. (2020). Instructors age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 11(4), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i4.6185

Alkinani, E. A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2021). Evaluating the Usability and Effectiveness of Madrasati Platforms as a Learning-Management System in Saudi Arabia for Public Education. International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security, 21(6), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.6.36

Almaiah, M. A., Hajjej, F., Lutfi, A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Shehab, R., Al-Otaibi, S., & Alrawad, M. (2022). Explaining the Factors Affecting Students’ Attitudes to Using Online Learning (Madrasati Platform) during COVID-19. Electronics, 11(7), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11070973

Al-Ohali, Y., Alhojailan M., Palavitsinis N., Najjar J., Koutoumanos A., & AlSuhaibani A. (2019, July 24-28). Human Factors in Digital Transformation of Education: Lessons Learned from the future gate at Saudi K-12. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Washington D.C., USA.

Alrashoud, K. A. (2020). Managing Technology Transition in Saudi Arabia (1st Ed.). Springer Singapore. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-981-15 -5803-0

Attuquayefio, S. & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyse students’ ICT adoption. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 10(3), 75-86. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/148478/

Bervell, B., Nyagorme, P., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-Enabled Blended Learning Use Intentions among Distance Education Tutors: Examining the Mediation Role of Attitude Based on Technology-Related Stimulus-Response Theoretical Framework. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep273. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8317

Binyamin, S. S., Rutter, M. J., & Smith, S. (2020). The moderating effect of gender and age on the students’ acceptance of learning-management systems in Saudi higher education. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 12(1), 30-62. http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/view/432

Cabero-Almenara, J., Arancibia, M., & Del Prete, A. (2019). Technical and didactic knowledge of the Moodle LMS in higher education. Beyond functional use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 25-33. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/207147/

Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioural intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652

Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2020). The moderating role of gender and age in the adoption of mobile wallet. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 6(3), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2019-0094

Coleman, E., & Mtshazi, S. (2017). Factors affecting the use and non-use of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by academic staff. South African Computer Journal, 29(3),31-63. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-c5c71ede6

Do Nam Hung, J. T., Azam, S. F., & Khatibi, A. A. (2019). An Empirical Analysis of Perceived Transaction Convenience, Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy and Behavior Intention to Mobile Payment of Cambodian Users. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 11(4). http://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v11n4p77

Dong, X. (2019). Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, and Relative Advantage Affecting Chinese Customers’ Decision to Use Mobile Payment in Bangkok. Bangkok University. Retrieved from http://dspace.bu.ac.th/jspui/handle/123456789/3779

Fu, J. S., Shumate, M., & Contractor, N. (2020). Organizational and Individual Innovation Decisions in an Interorganizational System: Social Influence and Decision-Making Authority. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa018

Funmilola, B. O., Olalere, Y. M., Oluwole, O. M., Modupe, A. E., & Ayodeji, A. G. (2019, September 23-26). Examining Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy as Determinants of Secondary School Teachers’ behavioural Intention to Use Mobile Technologies for Instruction in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Kaduna State, Nigeria. https://www.ijitie.aitie.org.ng/index.php/ijitie/article/download/97/49#page=44

Gunasinghe, A., Abd Hamid, J., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. F. (2019). The adequacy of UTAUT-3 in interpreting academician’s adoption to e-Learning in higher education environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17 (1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2019-0020

Guo, Y. (2014, 31 October- 02 November). Moderating effects of gender in the acceptance of mobile SNS-Based on UTAUT model. Shanghai, China. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICMeCG.2014.41

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2003). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). CENGAGE, India. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022460X14009493

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Pearson, New York. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1841396 References

Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multi-categorical independent variable. British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 67(3), 451-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028

Ifinedo, P., Pyke, J., & Anwar, A. (2018). Business undergraduates’ perceived use outcomes of Moodle in a blended learning environment: The roles of usability factors and external support. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.001

Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning: The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10(1), 33-52. http://www.ijello.org/Volume10/IJELLOv10p033-052Khechine0876.pdf

Ling, L. W., Ahmad, W. F. W., & Singh, T. K. R. (2020). Behavioural intentional to use computers among educators. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 33(1), 144-155. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJBIS.2020.104800

Magsamen-Conrad, K., Upadhyaya, S., Joa, C. Y., & Dowd, J. (2015). Bridging the divide: Using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Computers in human behavior, 50, 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.032

Mahdi, H. S., & Al-Dera, A. S. A. (2013). The Impact of Teachers’ Age, Gender and Experience on the Use of Information and Communication Technology in EFL Teaching. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 57-67. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077056

Masmali, A. (2020). A mixed-methods study of examining the concerns of Saudi Arabian middle and secondary school teachers in adopting the Future Gate Learning Management System: A transformation to digital learning. Kansas State University. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/mixed-methods-study-examining-concerns-saudi/docview/2425920803/se-2?accountid=27931

McMurtry, A. (2020). Relief for the exhausted post-positivist: New epistemological choices transcend positivism, relativism, and even post- positivism. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 11(6), e197. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.71217

Mitchell, B., & Alfuraih, A. (2018). The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Achieving the Aspirations of the National Transformation Program 2020 and Saudi Vision 2030 Through Education. Journal of Education and Development, 2(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v2i3.526

Nyembezi, N., & Bayaga, A. (2015). Analysis of the Effect of Effort Expectancy on School Learners’ Adoption and Use of Cloud Computing. Journal of Communication, 6(1), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0976691X.2015.11884853

Onaolapo, S., & Oyewole, O. (2018). Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions as factors influencing smart phones use for mobile learning by postgraduate students of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 14(1), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.28945/4085

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (2nd Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452

Pangaribuan, C. H., & Wulandar, Y. S. (2019, August 1). A Crowdfunding Platform User Acceptance: An Empirical Examination of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Factors, Facilitating Condition, Attitude, And Behavioral Intention. In SU-AFBE 2018: Proceedings of the 1st Sampoerna University-AFBE International Conference. Jakarta, Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-12-2018.2286301

Peñarroja, V., Sánchez, J., Gamero, N., Orengo, V., & Zornoza, A. M. (2019). The influence of organizational facilitating conditions and technology acceptance factors on the effectiveness of virtual communities of practice. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(8), 845-857. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1564070

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioural intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behaviour, 72, 644-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modelling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35.https://doi.org/10.1145/3378184.3378221

Shanmugam, A., Savarimuthu, M. T., & Wen, T. C. (2014). Factors affecting Malaysian behavioural intention to use mobile banking with mediating effects of attitude. Academic Research International, 5(2), 236. http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.5(2)/2014(5.2-28).pdf

Singh, N., & Sinha, N. (2020). How perceived trust mediates merchant’s intention to use a mobile wallet technology. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101894

Tarhini, A., Masa’deh, R. E., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: a structural equation modelling approach. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0032

Urhahne, D. (2015). Teacher behavior as a mediator of the relationship between teacher judgment and students’ motivation and emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.006

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wang, V., Torrisi-Steele, G., & Reinsfield, E. (2020). Transformative learning, epistemology and technology in adult education. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 1477971420918602. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1477971420918602

Wiseman, A. W., Al-bakr, F., Davidson, P. M., & Bruce, E. (2018). Using technology to break gender barriers: gender differences in teachers’ information and communication technology use in Saudi Arabian classrooms. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(2), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1301200

Yu, C. S. (2012). Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Journal of electronic commerce research, 13(2), 104. http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/13_3_p01_0.pdf

Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Doll, W., Deng, X., & Williams, M. (2018). The impact of organizational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(4), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436590

Zimmermann, T. (2020). Social Influence or Rational Choice? Two Models and Their Contribution to Explaining Class Differentials in Student Educational Aspirations. European Sociological Review, 36(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz054

Ziraba, A., Akwene, G. C., & Lwanga, S. C. (2020). The Adoption And Use Of Moodle Learning Management System In Higher Institutions Of Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. American Journal of Online and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajodl.489

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30