Learners’ Active Engagement in Searching and Designing Learning Materials through a Handson Instructional Model
Keywords:community secondary schools; hands-on activities; learners’ active engagement; learning materials
When engaging learners in searching and designing, the learning materials are of paramount importance, in order to help the learners in the achievement of academic goals and objectives. However, learners being the primary consumers of chemistry content delivered by the teachers, ought to beware of the learning materials that can facilitate their learning. This can well be done if learners participate fully in searching and designing learning materials that correspond with the lesson content. The purpose of this research was to use a Hands-on Instructional Model (HIM) designed to help secondary school teachers actively to engage learners in searching, designing, and manipulating locally made learning materials, in order to facilitate the face-to-face learning of chemistry concepts. The study employed Design-Based Research (DBR) in designing, refining, and implementing HIM, as well as the learning materials designed by the learners following a pragmatic philosophical world-view. The data were collected and analysed by using qualitative research techniques; and the research instruments included Lesson-Observation Protocol, semi-structured interviews, and Focus-Group Discussions. The study involved three intact senior-science classes deliberately selected from three Dar es Salaam community-secondary schools. The results revealed that learners become actively engaged in the lesson, when the learning materials designed by themselves are used. They used materials, like empty water bottles of different sizes, syringes of different sizes, rubber bands, and pegs to prepare locally made apparatus that served as beakers, burettes, droppers, and funnels in titration hands-on activities. In this regard, we recommend teachers involve learners in searching and designing the learning materials to be used in the teaching and learning process, in order to enhance chemistry content mastery and the acquisition of soft learning skills.
Alkan, F. (2019). Examining the instructional materials' motivation of prospective chemistry teachers in the laboratory. SHS Web of Conferences, 66, 01006. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196601006
Arop, B. A., Umanah, F. I., & Effiong, O. E. (2019). Effect of instructional materials on the teaching and learning of basic science in junior secondary schools in Cross River State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v14i1.9
Aydin-Günbatar, S., & Demirdö?en, B. (2017). Chemistry Teaching Method Course for Secondary-Science Teacher Training. In A. J. Sickel & S. B. Witzig (Eds.), Designing and Teaching the Secondary-Science Methods Course (pp. 129–148). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-881-5_8
Basit, T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143–154.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Bowler, L., & Large, A. (2008). Design-based research for LIS. Library & Information Science Research, 30(1), 39–46.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Weate, P. (2016). Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 213–227). Routledge.
Choppin, J., Roth McDuffie, A., Drake, C., & Davis, J. (2020). The role of instructional materials in the relationship between the official curriculum and the enacted curriculum. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1855376
Cirenza, C. F., Diller, T. E., & Williams, C. B. (2018). Hands-On Workshops to Assist in Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Heat Transfer. Journal of Heat Transfer, 140(9).
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th edn). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril. Creswell, JW (2009). Research Design. Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Approaches, 570–590.
Creswell, J. W. (2014a). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014b). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches (4th edn). SAGE Publications.
Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549–1554.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30(4), 3–14.
Hayat, M., Hasan, R., Ali, S. I., & Kaleem, M. (2017). Active learning and student engagement using Activity-Based Learning. 2017 International Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems (Trends and Future Directions) (ICTUS), 201–204.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743–757.
Ibe, N., Obikezie, M., Awka, & Chikendu, R. (2021). Effect of Improvised Instructional Materials on Chemistry Students’ Academic Retention in Secondary School. International Journal of Research in Education and Sustainable Development, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.46654/IJRESD.1520
Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L., & Shahan, E. (2013). Exploring Relationships between Setting up Complex Tasks and Opportunities to Learn in Concluding Whole-Class Discussions in Middle-Grades Mathematics Instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 646–682. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0646
Jensen, J. L., & Lawson, A. (2011). Effects of Collaborative Group Composition and Inquiry Instruction on Reasoning Gains and Achievement in Undergraduate Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0089
Kanellopoulou, E.-M., & Darra, M. (2018). The Planning of Teaching in the Context of Lesson Study: Research Findings. International Education Studies, 11(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n2p67
Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
Khoiriyah, U., Roberts, C., Jorm, C., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2015). Enhancing students’ learning in problem-based learning: Validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0422-2
Ko, J., Sammons, P., CfBT Education Trust (Great Britain), Hong Kong Institute of Education (China), & University of Oxford (England), D. of E. (2013). Effective Teaching: A Review of Research and Evidence.
Lui, A. (2012). Teaching in the Zone: An introduction to working within the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) to drive effective early childhood instruction. Children’s Progress, 1–10.
Machumu, H. (2011). The Growing Impetus of Community Secondary Schools in Tanzania: Quality concern is debatable. http://content.grin.com/document/v181095.pdf
Mafumiko, F. (2006). Micro-Scale Chemistry Experiments as a Catalyst for Improving the Chemistry Curriculum in Tanzania. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed). Sage.
Nbina, J. B., & Mmaduka, O. A. (2014). Enhancing chemistry teaching in secondary schools: An alternative teaching approach. AFRREV STECH: An International Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 127–135.
O-saki, K. (2007). “Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation in Tanzania: Lessons from Teacher Improvement Projects in Tanzania, 1965-2006. International Education Cooperation, 2(1), 51–64.
Pirttimaa, M., Husu, J., & Metsärinne, M. (2017). Uncovering procedural knowledge in craft, design, and technology education: A case of hands-on activities in electronics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9345-9
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2018). Designing context-based teaching materials by transforming authentic scientific modelling practices in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1108–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470347
Reeves, T. C. (2000). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other development research strategies. International Perspectives on Instructional Technology Research for the 21st Century, 27, 1–15.
Rizk, L. (2011). Learning by doing: Toward an experiential approach to professional development. Cairo, Egypt.
Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., Croker, S., & Härtig, H. (2016). What students learn from hands-on activities: HANDS-ON VERSUS PAPER-AND-PENCIL. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 980–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21320
Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00111C
Sikandar, A. (2016). John Dewey and his philosophy of education. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(2), 191–201.
Stammes, H., Henze, I., Barendsen, E., & de Vries, M. (2020). Bringing design practices to chemistry classrooms: Studying teachers’ pedagogical ideas in the context of a professional learning community. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 526–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1717015
Udogu, M.-A. E., & Enukora, E. (2017). The Efficacy of Locally Improvised Materials and Home Activities on Students Achievement and Retention in Chemistry. International Digital Organization for Scientific Research, 2(3), 30–41.
Valdez, A. V., Lomoljo, A., Dumrang, S. P., & Didatar, M. M. (2015). Developing critical thinking through activity-based and co-operative learning approach in teaching high-school chemistry. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(1), 139.
Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2010). Teachers implementing context-based teaching materials: A framework for case-analysis in chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005468M
Wang, C. X. (2021). CAFE: An Instructional Design Model to Assist K-12 Teachers to Teach Remotely during and beyond the Covid-19 Pandemic. TechTrends, 65(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00555-8
Wood, C. (2006). The development of creative problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 96–113.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th edn). Sage Publications.
Copyright (c) 2022 Esther S. Kibga, Emmanuel Gakuba, John Sentongo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).